Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915984›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2023

Diastolic delta best predicts paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance: the APPOSE trial.

Maxim J P Rooijakkers, Niels A Stens, Marleen H van Wely, Kees van der Wulp, Laura Rodwell, Helmut Gehlmann, Leen A F M van Garsse, Guillaume S C Geuzebroek, Michel W A Verkroost, Jesse Habets and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Maxim J P RooijakkersDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6815-7667
Niels A StensDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marleen H van WelyDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kees van der WulpDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Laura RodwellDepartment of Health Sciences, Section Biostatistics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Helmut GehlmannDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Leen A F M van GarsseDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Guillaume S C GeuzebroekDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0407-2901
Michel W A VerkroostDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jesse HabetsDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Saloua El MessaoudiDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dick H J ThijssenDepartment of Physiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Robin NijveldtDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Niels van RoyenDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Abbott
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsParavalvular regurgitation (PVR) is a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that poses an increased risk of rehospitalization for heart failure and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of haemodynamic indices to predict relevant PVR. METHODS AND

resultsIn this prospective single-centre clinical trial, four haemodynamic indices of PVR measured during TAVR were assessed for their correlation with gold standard cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived regurgitant fraction (CMR-RF) at 1 month follow-up: diastolic delta (DD), heart rate-adjusted diastolic delta (HR-DD), aortic regurgitation index (ARI), and aortic regurgitation index ratio (ARI ratio). These haemodynamic indices were analysed for their ability to predict relevant PVR (defined as CMR-RF > 20%) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with corresponding area under the ROC curves (AUCs). A total of 77 patients were included and had CMR performed 41 ± 14 days after TAVR. Mean CMR-RF was 12.4 ± 9.3%. Fifteen (19.5%) patients had CMR-RF > 20%. DD had the best correlation with CMR-RF and the highest AUC to predict relevant PVR (0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92), followed by HR-DD (AUC 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.89), ARI (AUC 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89), and ARI ratio (AUC 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81). The optimal cut-off value for DD was 32 mmHg, with sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 77% in predicting relevant PVR.

conclusionDD measured during TAVR best predicts relevant PVR. Correction for heart rate (HR-DD) or systolic blood pressure (ARI, ARI ratio) did not improve this predictive value.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic ValveHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcomeaortic stenosiscardiac magnetic resonanceoutcomesparavalvular regurgitationtranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID36915984
PMCPMC10364621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.