ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2023
Accuracy of actual stage prediction using Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) before radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma in SUPER-UC-Cx.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing VIRADS score for image-guided assessment of muscle invasiveness in bladder cancer pre-TURBT: An updated meta-analysis.Arab journal of urology · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and its role in reducing repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A systematic review.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Magnetic resonance radiographic features which might lead to misdiagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer based on vesical imaging reporting and data system: the application experience of a single center.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Synergy of PET and MR imaging in the local and regional staging of bladder cancer.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies using the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) to predict muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) had some limitations. Most studies were performed with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR-BT) specimens with few samples. This study was conducted to address these shortcomings and confirm the accuracy of VI-RADS for bladder cancer. Methods: This study used data from the Seoul National University Prospectively Enrolled Registry for Urothelial Cancer-Radical Cystectomy (SUPER-UC-Cx). Patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) before radical cystectomy (RC) were included in this study between March 2020 and March 2022. All images were reported by radiologists and reviewed by two urologists. The patient characteristics and clinical information were blinded during the review. The performance of qualitative and quantitative variables in predicting muscle layer invasion or perivesical fat infiltration was verified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Of 208 patients, 182 (87.5%) underwent mp-MRI before RC. Twenty-three patients with non-urothelial carcinoma, inappropriate MRI scans, and bladder filling were excluded. Cut-off for muscle invasion, VI-RADS score of 4 had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (sensitivity 0.84; specificity 0.93; accuracy 0.90; positive predictive value (PPV) 0.84; negative predictive value (NPV) 0.93, and AUC 0.88). Cut-off for perivesical fat invasion and VI-RADS score of 5 had the highest AUC (sensitivity, 0.78; specificity, 0.99; accuracy, 0.95; PPV, 0.96; NPV, 0.95; and AUC, 0.89). Conclusions: VI-RADS is a good predictor of bladder cancer staging before RC and is especially helpful in predicting muscle invasion and perivesical fat infiltration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.