Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915870›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2023

Limitations of Serological Diagnosis of Typical Cat Scratch Disease and Recommendations for the Diagnostic Procedure.

Myrto Koutantou, Konstantinos Kambas, Sofia Makka, Pierre-Edouard Fournier, Didier Raoult, Emmanouil Angelakis

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Viable but nonculturable state in the zoonotic pathogenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Myrto KoutantouDiagnostic Department and Public Health Laboratories, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, Athens 11521, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3865-0183
Konstantinos KambasLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, Athens 11521, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9264-8458
Sofia MakkaDiagnostic Department and Public Health Laboratories, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, Athens 11521, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6901-3366
Pierre-Edouard FournierAix Marseille Université, IRD, APHM, SSA, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, 19-21 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille 13005, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8463-8885
Didier RaoultAix Marseille Université, IRD, APHM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, 19-21 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille 13005, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0633-5974
Emmanouil AngelakisDiagnostic Department and Public Health Laboratories, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, Athens 11521, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2743-5165
Aix-Marseille Université · FRPasteur Hellenic Institute · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cat scratch disease (CSD) is the most common cause of bacterial infectious lymphadenopathy, especially in children, but its diagnosis still remains challenging. Serological assays are widely applied due to their simplicity and the non-invasive sampling. However, these techniques present several limitations, including not well-defined antigen preparation, assay conditions and cutoff titers, severe cross-reactions with other species and organisms, and the notably ranging seroprevalence in the normal population. The objective of this study is to review the literature in order to determine the best diagnostic procedure for the diagnosis of CSD. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and Google were searched to determine the best diagnostic procedure for the diagnosis of CSD. A total of 437 papers were identified and screened, and after exclusion of papers that did not fulfill the including criteria, 63 papers were used. Results: It was revealed that sensitivities of serological assays varied from 10% to 100%. Indeed, more than half of the studies reported a sensitivity lower than 70%, while 71% of them had a sensitivity lower than 80%. Moreover, specificities of serological assays ranged from 15% to 100%, with 25 assays reporting a specificity lower than 90%. Conclusion: It is considered that molecular assays should be the gold standard technique for CSD confirmation, and physicians are reinforced to proceed to lymph node biopsy in suspicious CSD cases.

Identifiers

PMID36915870
PMCPMC10008113
OpenAlexW4323074292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read90
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.