Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915864›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023

The efficacy of the entire-vial dosing of emicizumab: Real-world evidence on plasma concentrations, bleeds, and drug waste.

Anouk A M T Donners, Konrad van der Zwet, Carin M A Rademaker, Toine C G Egberts, Roger E G Schutgens, Kathelijn Fischer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Emicizumab prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A: Waste estimation and the Brazilian perspective.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The dosing conundrum of emicizumab: To waste product or not?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anouk A M T DonnersDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Konrad van der ZwetVan Creveldkliniek, Center for Benign Haematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Carin M A RademakerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Toine C G EgbertsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Roger E G SchutgensVan Creveldkliniek, Center for Benign Haematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Kathelijn FischerVan Creveldkliniek, Center for Benign Haematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prophylaxis with emicizumab provides effective bleeding protection in persons with hemophilia A (PwHA) but pressures healthcare budgets. The body weight-adjusted dosing at 7-, 14-, or 28-day intervals, according to the label, often mismatches the vial content. Entire-vial dosing resulted in therapeutic concentrations according to pharmacokinetic simulations and was introduced to avoid waste. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of entire-vial dosing of emicizumab by investigating real-world evidence of plasma concentrations, bleeds, and drug waste. Methods: This is a single-center, observational study with PwHA receiving emicizumab in mg/kg doses according to label but dosing interval extrapolated to the nearest vial size. Patient characteristics and bleeds were compared 1 year before starting emicizumab and during emicizumab until January 2022. Concentrations were assessed at weeks 4, 12, and annually. The mean (95% CI) annualized bleed rates were compared by using negative binomial regression. Drug waste between label-based dosing and entire-vial dosing was compared. Results: A total of 112 individuals (94% severe phenotype and 9% positive FVIII inhibitors) were followed for a median of 56 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 52-68) before and 51 weeks (IQR 29-75) after starting emicizumab. The median emicizumab dose was 5.9 (IQR 5.5-6.2) mg/kg/4 wk with median concentrations of 63 (IQR 51-80) μg/mL. The annualized bleed rate of treated bleeds before emicizumab was 3.6 (95% CI 2.9-4.4) and was 0.8 (95% CI 0.6-1.1) during emicizumab ( Conclusion: The entire-vial dosing of emicizumab is an attractive treatment option for PwHA leading to therapeutic plasma concentrations, good bleeding control, and drug waste avoidance.

Indexed as

emicizumabentire-vial dosinghemophilia Aobservational studyreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID36915864
PMCPMC10005899
OpenAlexW4319455727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.