Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915837›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Waterpipe Use and Its Cardiovascular Effects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control, Cross-Sectional, and Non-Randomized Studies.

Kamran Mahfooz, Advait M Vasavada, Arpit Joshi, Srikrishnan Pichuthirumalai, Rupesh Andani, Arush Rajotia, Aakash Hans, Bilvesh Mandalia, Neeraj Dayama, Zara Younas and 5 more

Open access · diamondFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Toxicity of waterpipe tobacco smoking: the role of flavors, sweeteners, humectants, and charcoal.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kamran MahfoozInternal Medicine, Lincoln Medical Center, New York, USA.
Advait M VasavadaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Arpit JoshiMedicine, B. J. (Byramjee Jeejeebhoy) Medical, Ahmedabad, IND.
Srikrishnan PichuthirumalaiInternal Medicine, Sakra World Hospital, Bengaluru, IND.
Rupesh AndaniInternal Medicine, Jeevandhara Hospital, Jamnagar, IND.
Arush RajotiaCardiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Aakash HansInternal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA.
Bilvesh MandaliaHouse Officer, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Medical College, Sion Mumbai, Mumbai, IND.
Neeraj DayamaInternal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.
Zara YounasMedicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Nosheen HafeezMedicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Niharika BheemisettyPediatrics, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Yash PatelMedicine, Gujarat Cancer Society Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Hemalatha Tumkur RanganathanMedicine, Mandya Institute of Medical Science, Mandya, IND.
Ashok SodalaMedicine, Shri M. P. Shah Government Medical College, Jamnagar, IND.
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · USHenry Ford Health System · USLincoln Medical Center · USMayo Clinic · USTexas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 100 million people globally smoke cigarettes, making it a significant and quickly spreading global tobacco epidemic. Substance use disorders are frequently evaluated by non-randomized studies. Tobacco use and its impacts on the cardiovascular system were the subjects of a comprehensive search across five electronic databases: Cochrane, MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and PubMed. The findings demonstrated that waterpipe smokers in comparison to non-smokers have immediate elevations in heart rate and blood pressure, lower levels of high-density lipoprotein, higher levels of low-density lipoprotein, higher levels of triglycerides, higher levels of fasting blood glucose, and a higher heart rate. Users of waterpipes and cigarettes had similar average heart rates, blood pressure, and lipid levels, with the exception that waterpipe smokers had greater total cholesterol. Smoking a waterpipe has significant negative effects on the cardiovascular system comparable to cigarette smoking, and non-randomized studies proved to yield substantial evidence related to its cardiovascular effects. Such study designs can be used to evaluate substance use and its cardiovascular impact.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseaseheated tobacco productsnon-randomized studiestobacco use disorderwaterpipe

Identifiers

PMID36915837
PMCPMC10008028
OpenAlexW4319728582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read16
measurements read32
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.