ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Efficacy of modified isolation in incontinence associated dermatitis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydrocolloid versus Liquid Dressings for Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis: A Clinical Evaluation in Critically Ill Patients.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the value of modified isolation in preventing the occurrence of incontinence associated dermatitis (IAD) in patients with incontinence, and to provide high value skin care intervention for the patients.
methodsClinical data of 204 patients were collected for retrospective analysis. The patients were divided into a conventional group (conventional skin care protocol, n=102) and a modified group (modified isolation care protocol, n=102) according to the different treatment regimens. The differences in the incidence of IAD, time to IAD, required weekly care, cost of nursing supplies, perineal skin status and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared with the conventional group, the modified group had a greatly lower incidence of IAD (42.16% vs. 2.94%), longer time to IAD occurrence (5.75±1.25 vs. 12.50±1.50), less required weekly care (43.05±8.41 vs. 13.54±2.57), lower cost of nursing supplies (330.16±98.44 vs. 115.53±32.58), and a better correlation between perineal skin status and nursing satisfaction (all
conclusionModified isolation can greatly reduce the incidence of IAD in incontinent patients, improve their status of the perineal skin, increase patient satisfaction with care, and reduce the cost of required nursing supplies. So, modified isolation may serve as the preferred care protocol for incontinent patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36915781PMC10006786W4324130428What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.