ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2023
Strategies of strengthening mechanical properties in the osteoinductive calcium phosphate bioceramics.
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein adsorption at material interface: mechanistic design framework for engineering ceramic scaffolds for bone repair applications.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Influence of heating rate and soak time on microwave sintered hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate ceramics for bone applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bioinspired Nanoscale 3D Printing of Calcium Phosphates Using Bone Prenucleation Clusters.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Strategic incorporation of metal ions in bone regenerative scaffolds: multifunctional platforms for advancing osteogenesis.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Advancements in nanohydroxyapatite: synthesis, biomedical applications and composite developments.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional-printed triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds via digital light processing for enhanced osteogenesis.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Engineered Carbon Nanotube Scaffolds for Next-Generation Tissue Engineering: Synergizing Mechanical, Electrical, and Bioactive Properties - a Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Comparison Between Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Composite and Autogenous Bone Graft in Bone Regeneration Applications: Biochemical Mechanisms and Morphological Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Mechanical and Functional Improvement of β-TCP Scaffolds for Use in Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcium phosphate (CaP) bioceramics are widely applied in the bone repairing field attributing to their excellent biological properties, especially osteoinductivity. However, their applications in load-bearing or segmental bone defects are severely restricted by the poor mechanical properties. It is generally considered that it is challenging to improve mechanical and biological properties of CaP bioceramics simultaneously. Up to now, various strategies have been developed to enhance mechanical strengths of CaP ceramics, the achievements in recent researches need to be urgently summarized. In this review, the effective and current means of enhancing mechanical properties of CaP ceramics were comprehensively summarized from the perspectives of fine-grain strengthening, second phase strengthening, and sintering process optimization. What's more, the further improvement of mechanical properties for CaP ceramics was prospectively proposed including heat treatment and biomimetic. Therefore, this review put forward the direction about how to compatibly improve mechanical properties of CaP ceramics, which can provide data and ideas for expanding the range of their clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.