Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915664›Full record

ReviewPeerJ2023

Annotated checklist of the beetles (Coleoptera) of the California Channel Islands.

Matthew L Gimmel, M Andrew Johnston, Michael S Caterino

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew L GimmelDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California, United States.
M Andrew JohnstonBiodiversity Knowledge Integration Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0166-6985
Michael S CaterinoDepartment of Plant & Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2597-5707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The beetle fauna of the California Channel Islands is here enumerated for the first time in over 120 years. We provide an annotated checklist documenting species-by-island diversity from an exhaustive literature review and analysis of a compiled dataset of 26,609 digitized specimen records to which were added over 3,000 individual specimen determinations. We report 825 unique species from 514 genera and 71 families (including 17 new family records) comprising 1,829 species-by-island records. Species totals for each island are as follows: Anacapa (74); San Clemente (197); San Miguel (138); San Nicolas (146); Santa Barbara (64); Santa Catalina (370); Santa Cruz (503); and Santa Rosa (337). This represents the largest list of species published to date for any taxonomic group of animals on the Channel Islands; despite this, we consider the checklist to be preliminary. We present evidence that both inventory and taxonomic efforts on Channel Islands beetles are far from complete. Rarefaction estimates indicate there are at least several hundred more species of beetles yet to be recorded from the islands. Despite the incomplete nature of existing records, we found that species diversity is highly correlated with island area. We report 56 species which are putatively geographically restricted (endemic) to the Channel Islands, with two additional species of questionable endemic status. We also report 52 species from the islands which do not natively occur in the southern California region.

Indexed as

ColeopteraPoriferaAnimalsCaliforniaChannel IslandsChecklistBiodiversity informaticsConservationEndemismFaunisticsIsland biogeographyNomenclatureTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID36915664
PMCPMC10007975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read218
reference markers read2,671
identifiers read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.