Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915571›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Clinical anatomy teaching: A promising strategy for anatomic education.

Yujie Zhang, Zhenni Ji, Peizhi Zhou, Lihua Dong, Yao Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparing the Clinical Orientation Benefits of Endoscopic demonstration on the Nose, Paranasal Sinuses, and Skull Base Versus Cadaveric Dissection for First-Year Medical Undergraduates.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yujie ZhangWest China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhenni JiWest China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Peizhi ZhouWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lihua DongWest China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yao ChenWest China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Human anatomy is a predominant course that helps medical students enhance their performance in other clinical curricula. However, it is difficult for students to learn the relationship between anatomy and diseases, since the traditional teaching modality of anatomy courses does not contain enough clinical contents. Clinical anatomy education merges clinical diagnosis and treatment into anatomy learning. This study seeks to determine whether systematic clinical anatomy teaching can improve students' performance and interest in anatomy courses. Methods: This study was a retrospective study conducted at West China Medical School, Sichuan University. Medical students of the 8-year program who participated in the course "HUMAN MORPHOLOGY" in the academic years of 2014-2018 did not receive a systematic clinical anatomy course, while those in the academic years of 2018-2022 did. These two groups were involved to analyze their final examination. Then, a questionnaire for students in the academic year of 2021-2022 was conducted to assess their general satisfaction and opinions on the usefulness and learning modalities of clinical anatomy courses. Results: Students who received systematic clinical anatomy lessons performed significantly better than those who were not in the final examinations. The average grades were 73.64 and 79.90 in the 3rd semester of medicine (p < 0.0001) and 75.70 and 82.18 in the 4th semester of medicine (p < 0.0001) before and after 2018, respectively. The response rate of the questionnaire was 77.78%, and most of the students agreed that the clinical anatomy lessons were satisfactory, with 40 out of 71 (56.34%) strongly agreeing and 26 out of 71 (36.62%) agreeing. Conclusion: Clinical anatomy education should be more emphasized and merged into the gross anatomy curriculum owing to the better performance in the final examination and high rate of satisfaction.

Indexed as

Clinical anatomyDissectionMedical educationMedical students

Identifiers

PMID36915571
PMCPMC10006433
OpenAlexW4322102497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.