ArticleHeliyon2023
Clinical anatomy teaching: A promising strategy for anatomic education.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the effects of 3D videos and structured peer discussions on anatomy learning: A four-arm randomized controlled trial.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Trial
- What Is Clinical Anatomy?-A Consensus Statement From the American Association of Clinical Anatomists.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Education and training in hand surgery: Upper limb cadaveric dissection course improves the learning curve.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025Article
- Retention of gross and clinical anatomy knowledge among medical graduates in Sudan: a comparative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Comparing the Clinical Orientation Benefits of Endoscopic demonstration on the Nose, Paranasal Sinuses, and Skull Base Versus Cadaveric Dissection for First-Year Medical Undergraduates.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human anatomy is a predominant course that helps medical students enhance their performance in other clinical curricula. However, it is difficult for students to learn the relationship between anatomy and diseases, since the traditional teaching modality of anatomy courses does not contain enough clinical contents. Clinical anatomy education merges clinical diagnosis and treatment into anatomy learning. This study seeks to determine whether systematic clinical anatomy teaching can improve students' performance and interest in anatomy courses. Methods: This study was a retrospective study conducted at West China Medical School, Sichuan University. Medical students of the 8-year program who participated in the course "HUMAN MORPHOLOGY" in the academic years of 2014-2018 did not receive a systematic clinical anatomy course, while those in the academic years of 2018-2022 did. These two groups were involved to analyze their final examination. Then, a questionnaire for students in the academic year of 2021-2022 was conducted to assess their general satisfaction and opinions on the usefulness and learning modalities of clinical anatomy courses. Results: Students who received systematic clinical anatomy lessons performed significantly better than those who were not in the final examinations. The average grades were 73.64 and 79.90 in the 3rd semester of medicine (p < 0.0001) and 75.70 and 82.18 in the 4th semester of medicine (p < 0.0001) before and after 2018, respectively. The response rate of the questionnaire was 77.78%, and most of the students agreed that the clinical anatomy lessons were satisfactory, with 40 out of 71 (56.34%) strongly agreeing and 26 out of 71 (36.62%) agreeing. Conclusion: Clinical anatomy education should be more emphasized and merged into the gross anatomy curriculum owing to the better performance in the final examination and high rate of satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.