ArticleHeliyon2023
Fixation of intra-articular calcaneal fractures: A comparative study of the postoperative outcome between HA/PPLA screws and locking plates.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison between screw fixation and plate fixation via sinus tarsi approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Treatment Options in Managing Infections Following Calcaneal Fractures: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Finite element analysis of restoring length with multiple internal fixations in calcaneal body fracture.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Forged unsintered hydroxyapatite and poly l-lactic acid Methods: From January 2013 to December 2019, 47 closed intra-articular fractures treated with either F-u-HA/PLLA screws (group S, 18 feet in 17 patients) or locking plates (group P, 29 feet in 28 patients) in a single trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. The sinus tarsi approach was used in both groups. The time to bone union, step-off, varus deformity, Bohler's angle, and width and height of the calcaneus were assessed after surgery. Ankle joint range of motion (ROM) and postoperative complications were also assessed. Results: All fractures were successfully treated. The Kaplan-Meier curves of the two groups showed similar trends. The log-rank test showed no significant difference in the time to bone union between the two groups (p = 0.48). In the Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for preoperative width and Bohler's angle, the hazard ratio for bone union was not statistically significant (HR: 1.13, 95%CI: 0.50-2.56, p = 0.78). Other variables included step-off (group S: 2.0 vs group P: 2.2 mm, p = 0.84), varus deformity (2.0° vs. 3.0°, p = 0.7), Gissane's angle (103.5° vs 104.0°, p = 0.84), width (38.0 vs 34.8 mm, p = 0.12), height (42.1 vs 44.0 mm, p = 0.07), and ankle ROM degrees (dorsal flexion, 20.0° vs. 20.0°, p = 0.13; plantar flexion 40.0° vs 40.0°, p = 0.56), which were not significantly different between groups P and S. The Bohler's angle was smaller in group S than in group P (20.5° vs 27.0°, p < 0.01). No skin necrosis or infection was observed in either group. Conclusion: Postoperative results of F-u-HA/PLLA screw fixation using the sinus tarsi approach for intra-articular calcaneal fractures were as good as those of locking plate fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.