Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915455›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023

Second-line and third-line therapy with nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in pancreatic cancer: a single-center experience and review of literature.

Christian Möhring, Freddy José Frontado Graffe, Alexandra Bartels, Farsaneh Sadeghlar, Taotao Zhou, Robert Mahn, Milka Marinova, Georg Feldmann, Peter Brossart, Tim R Glowka and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical application and drug resistance mechanism of gemcitabine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian MöhringDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Freddy José Frontado GraffeDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alexandra BartelsDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Farsaneh SadeghlarDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Taotao ZhouDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Robert MahnDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Milka MarinovaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Georg FeldmannDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Peter BrossartDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Tim R GlowkaDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jörg C KalffDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christian P StrassburgDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Maria A Gonzalez-CarmonaDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer is still extremely poor. First-line palliative therapies with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel have been established in the last decade. In the second-line, 5-FU/LV in combination with nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) after gemcitabine has been shown to be effective. However, the use of nal-IRI as third-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based chemotherapies is still controversial. In this study, we report about the use of 5-FU/LV + nal-IRI in a daily practice and analyze whether nal-IRI is an option as third-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Methods: This is a single center retrospective analysis of patients with irresectable pancreatic cancer who were treated with 5-FU/LV and nal-IRI from 2017 to 2021 as second- or third-line palliative treatment. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed, and multivariate analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: Twenty-nine patients receiving 5-FU/LV and nal-IRI were included in the analysis. The majority of patients (n=19) received 5-FU/nal-IRI as third-line therapy after pre-exposition to FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Median OS and PFS were 9.33 months (95% CI: 3.37, 15.30) and 2.90 months (95% CI: 1.64, 4.16), respectively. Furthermore, patients receiving nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as third-line treatment also showed some benefits, with no OS difference compared to second-line patients (9.33 Conclusions: In our study, the use of 5-FU/nal-IRI in unselected patients with advanced pancreatic cancer showed similar OS, PFS and tolerance as randomized prospective phase II/III trials. Interestingly, the use of 5-FU/nal-IRI seemed to be beneficial in third-line therapy, despite a pre-exposure to non-liposomal irinotecan.

Indexed as

FOLFIRINOXirinotecan resistancenal-irinotecanpalliative chemotherapypancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID36915455
PMCPMC10007927
OpenAlexW4320902952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.