ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023
Construction and validation of a predictive model for the risk of three-month-postoperative malnutrition in patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for malnutrition in patients with cancer: a systematic review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Risk prediction models for malnutrition in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for diagnosing perioperative malnutrition in older adults with hip fracture.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Preoperative serum prealbumin as a prognostic marker for survival after gallbladder cancer resection: a multicenter study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Short- and Mid-Term Outcomes of Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Total Gastrectomy in Early-Stage Proximal Gastric Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- A nomogram for predicting the risk of malnutrition in hospitalized older adults: a retrospective study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Erratum to Construction and validation of a predictive model for the risk of three-month-postoperative malnutrition in patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective case-control study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Insufficient enteral nutrition is an independent risk factor for poor clinical outcomes in gastric cancer patients following radical gastrectomy.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Identification of postoperative weight loss trajectories and development of a machine learning-based tool for predicting malnutrition in gastric cancer patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Research progress on predictive models for malnutrition in cancer patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
- Development of a nomogram for predicting malnutrition in elderly hospitalized cancer patients: a cross-sectional study in China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study analyzed both the influencing factors of malnutrition in patients with gastric cancer and established a multi-dimensional risk model to predict postoperative malnutrition three months after surgery. Methods: The clinical data of gastric cancer patients hospitalized for the first time and receiving laparoscopic surgery in the general surgery department of our hospital were retrospectively analyzed through the hospital information system and divided into a training set and a validation set in the ratio of 7:3. Nutritional status was assessed using the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment scale and follow-up records three months after surgery. Patients were divided into a non-malnutrition group and a malnutrition group, and a risk prediction model was established and displayed in the form of a nomogram. Results: A total of 344 patients were included, with 242 in the training and 102 in the validation set. Tumor node metastasis stage (TNM Stage, P=0.020), cardiac function grading (CFG, P=0.013), prealbumin (PAB, P<0.001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR, P=0.027), and enteral nutrition within 48 hours post-operation (EN 48 h post-op, P=0.025) were independent risk factors. We established a prediction model with the above variables and displayed it via a nomogram, then verified its effectiveness through internal and external verification. This revealed a C-index of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89), and the area under curve (AUC) areas of 0.840 (training set) and 0.854 (validation set), which was better than the nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002) scale. The calibration curve brier scores were 0.159 and 0.195, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test chi-square values were 14.070 and 1.989 (P>0.05). The decision curve analysis (DCA) of the training set model indicated the clinical applicability was good and within the threshold probability range of 10%-85%, which was also better than NRS2002. Conclusions: A clinical prediction model including multi-dimensional variables was established based on independent risk factors of malnutrition three months after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. The model yields greater prediction accuracy of the risk of three-month-postoperative malnutrition in patients with gastric cancer, helps screen high-risk patients, formulates targeted nutritional prescriptions early, and improves the overall prognosis of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.