ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023
A cuproptosis-related signature for predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of copper and cuproptosis in digestive system cancers: novel therapeutic strategies and mechanistic insights.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Revealing the cuproptosis-lncRNA nexus in gastric cancer: A multicohort observational study.Medicine · 2026Observational
- The role of cuproptosis in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- The role of cuproptosis in gastric cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies. Cuproptosis is a newly discovered type of cell death caused by protein toxicity stress, with copper having considerable importance in GC development. Methods: First, differentially expressed (DE) cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) were screened in GC. The tumor mutation burden (TMB) of CRGs was analyzed. We then performed enrichment analyses of DE-CRGs. Next, we constructed a GC cuproptosis-related (CR) signature (CRs) using Cox and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses. The predictive efficacy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Furthermore, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Different methods were used to assess tumor immunity of the CRs, and the Wilcoxon test was used to examine the expressions of Results: We identified 8 DE-CRGs in GC. There were 9 CRGs with TMB values >1%. We constructed gene expression networks and CRs for GC. The DE-CRGs were involved in important mitochondrial metabolic pathways, and the CRs was a valuable independent prognosis factor. The GSEA revealed that angiogenesis and metabolic-related pathways were enriched in the high-risk group, whereas the low-risk group showed enrichment in DNA replication mismatch and repair pathways. The expressions of immunological checkpoints, Conclusions: The novel CRs could predict the prognosis of GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.