ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023
Therapeutic response analysis for patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the gallbladder: data analysis based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the molecular profile of adenosquamous gallbladder carcinoma: characterization of a Caucasian cohort.Histopathology · 2026Article
- Gallbladder adenosquamous carcinoma: a case report and a review of the role of laparoscopy in managing a rare entity.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Primary adenosquamous carcinoma of the duodenum: A case report with literature review.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adenosquamous carcinoma of the gallbladder (GBASC) is a rare histological variant without defined appropriate clinical measures. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, data on a cohort of patients with GBASC were collected from 21 cancer registries between 1975 and 2018. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment regimens on patients with GBASC. Then we used Cox proportional hazards regression method to determine the prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival (CSS) of GBASC patients. Results: A total of 388 patients with GBASC were identified: 80 patients diagnosed as early stage and 308 patients diagnosed as advanced stage. For early-stage GBASC, radical lymph node dissection improved the CSS significantly; for advanced-stage GBASC, radical surgery, nonradical surgery, lymph node dissection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy improved the CSS significantly. Surgery, lymph node dissection, radiation, chemotherapy, age, race, and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage were the independent risk factors for the CSS of GBASC patients. Conclusions: Radical intraoperative lymph node dissection provided a survival benefit for patients with early-stage GBASC, whereas chemotherapy and radiotherapy provided no significant benefit; surgical treatment, more complete lymph node dissection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy provided survival benefits for patients with advanced GBASC. The prognosis for GBASC patients is affected by the factors of surgery, lymph node dissection, radiation, chemotherapy, age, race, and the AJCC stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.