Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915378›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Automated pancreatic islet viability assessment for transplantation using bright-field deep morphological signature.

Abbas Habibalahi, Jared M Campbell, Stacey N Walters, Saabah B Mahbub, Ayad G Anwer, Shane T Grey, Ewa M Goldys

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abbas HabibalahiGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Jared M CampbellGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Stacey N WaltersGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Saabah B MahbubGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Ayad G AnwerGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Shane T GreyGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Ewa M GoldysGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Australian Research Council · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Islets transplanted for type-1 diabetes have their viability reduced by warm ischemia, dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG; hypoxia model), oxidative stress and cytokine injury. This results in frequent transplant failures and the major burden of patients having to undergo multiple rounds of treatment for insulin independence. Presently there is no reliable measure to assess islet preparation viability prior to clinical transplantation. We investigated deep morphological signatures (DMS) for detecting the exposure of islets to viability compromising insults from brightfield images. Accuracies ranged from 98 % to 68 % for; ROS damage, pro-inflammatory cytokines, warm ischemia and DMOG. When islets were disaggregated to single cells to enable higher throughput data collection, good accuracy was still obtained (83-71 %). Encapsulation of islets reduced accuracy for cytokine exposure, but it was still high (78 %). Unsupervised modelling of the DMS for islet preparations transplanted into a syngeneic mouse model was able to predict whether or not they would restore glucose control with 100 % accuracy. Our strategy for constructing DMS' is effective for the assessment of islet pre-transplant viability. If translated into the clinic, standard equipment could be used to prospectively identify non-functional islet preparations unable to contribute to the restoration of glucose control and reduce the burden of unsuccessful treatments.

Indexed as

AI, artificial intelligenceDeep morphological signatureDMOG, dimethyloxalylglycineDMS, deep morphological signaturesECG, electrocardiogramEEG, electroencephalogramEMCCD, electron multiplying charge coupling deviceFD, Fisher DistanceGSIS, glucose stimulated insulin secretionIoU, intersection over unionMEG, magnetoencephalographyMRI, magnetic resonance imagingPancreatic isletPCA, principal component analysisROS, reactive oxygen speciesSI, swarm intelligenceSVM, support vector machineTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID36915378
PMCPMC10006710
OpenAlexW4321794091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.