Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915362›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Diagnostic performance of computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) for assessing functional severity of coronary lesions.

Jun Jiang, Changqing Du, Yumeng Hu, Hong Yuan, Jianhua Wang, Yibin Pan, Lifang Bao, Liang Dong, Changling Li, Yong Sun and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jun Jiang *Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Changqing Du *Department of Cardiology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yumeng Hu *ArteryFlow Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China.
Hong YuanDepartment of Cardiology, The First People's Hospital of Linping District, Hangzhou, China.
Jianhua WangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Yibin PanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, China.
Lifang BaoDepartment of Electrophysiology, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua, China.
Liang DongDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Changling LiDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yong SunDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaochang LengArteryFlow Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China.
Jianping XiangArteryFlow Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China.
Lijiang TangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jian'an WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNJinhua Central Hospital · CNNingbo University · CNZhejiang Hospital · CNHangzhou First People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gatekeeper for lesion-specific revascularization decision-making in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The potential of noninvasive calculation of FFR from coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) to identify ischemia-causing lesions has not been sufficiently assessed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a novel computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based technology, termed as AccuFFRct, for the diagnosis of functionally significant lesions from CCTA, using wire-based FFR as a reference standard. Methods: A total of 191 consecutive patients who underwent CCTA and FFR measurement for suspected or known CAD were retrospectively enrolled at 2 medical centers. Three-dimensional anatomic model of coronary tree was extracted from CCTA data, CFD was applied subsequently with a novel strategy for the computation of FFR in a blinded fashion by professionals. Results were compared to invasive FFR, a threshold of ≤0.80 was used to indicate the hemodynamically relevant stenosis. Results: On a per-patient basis, the overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of AccuFFRct for detecting ischemia were 91.78% (95% CI: 86.08% to 95.68%), 92.31% (95% CI: 81.46% to 97.86%) and 91.49% (95% CI: 83.92% to 96.25%), respectively; those for per-vessel basis were 91.05% (95% CI: 86.06% to 94.70%), 92.73% (95% CI: 82.41% to 97.98%) and 90.37% (95% CI: 84.10% to 94.77%), respectively. The AccuFFRct and FFR was well correlated on per-patient ( Conclusions: This novel CFD-based CCTA-derived FFR shows good diagnostic performance for detecting hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses and may potentially become a new gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

Indexed as

computational fluid dynamics (CFD)computed tomographic FFRCoronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA)fractional flow reserve (FFR)

Identifiers

PMID36915362
PMCPMC10006155
OpenAlexW4319299156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.