ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Deep learning-based segmentation of epithelial ovarian cancer on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligent diagnosis of ovarian cancer in PET/CT imaging based on KiteNet-MobileNetv3 fusion and CarveMix augmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Development of an AI-based magnetic resonance imaging reading support program (AMP) for deep endometriosis diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MRI-based Ovarian Lesion Classification via a Foundation Segmentation Model and Multimodal Analysis: A Multicenter Study.Radiology · 2025Article
- The Evolving Landscape of Ovarian Cancer: Innovations in Biotechnology and Artificial Intelligence- Based Screening and Treatment.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- An enhanced deep learning model for accurate classification of ovarian cancer from histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Explainable AI-based feature importance analysis for ovarian cancer classification with ensemble methods.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Recent trends in AI applications for pelvic MRI: a comprehensive review.La Radiologia medica · 2024Review
- Deep fine-KNN classification of ovarian cancer subtypes using efficientNet-B0 extracted features: a comprehensive analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Semisupervised 3D segmentation of pancreatic tumors in positron emission tomography/computed tomography images using a mutual information minimization and cross-fusion strategy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Radiomics Prediction of Muscle Invasion in Bladder Cancer Using Semi-Automatic Lesion Segmentation of MRI Compared with Manual Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 3D Printing for Cancer Diagnosis: What Unique Advantages Are Gained?ACS materials Au · 2023Review
- Automatic segmentation of the female pelvic floor muscles on MRI for pelvic floor function assessment.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) segmentation is an indispensable step in assessing the extent of disease and guiding the treatment plan that follows. Currently, manual segmentation is the most commonly used method, despite it being tedious, time-consuming and subject to inter- and intra-observer variability. This study aims to assess the feasibility of deep learning methods in the automatic segmentation of EOC on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Methods: A total of 339 EOC patients from eight different clinical centers were enrolled and divided into 4 groups: training set (n=154), validation set (n=25), internal test set (n=50) and external test set (n=110). Six common-used algorithms, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) (U-Net, DeepLabv3, U-Net++ and PSPNet) and transformers (TransUnet and Swin-Unet), were used to conduct automatic segmentations. The performances of these automatic segmentation methods were evaluated by means of dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), precision and recall. Results: All the results look promising, which demonstrates the feasibility of using deep learning for EOC segmentation. Overall, CNNs and transformers showed similar performances in both internal and external test sets. Among all the models, U-Net++ performed best with a DSC, HD, ASSD, precision and recall of 0.851, 25.3, 1.75, 0.838, 0.882 and 0.740, 42.5, 4.21, 0.825, 0.725 in internal and external test sets, respectively. Conclusions: Fully automated segmentation of EOC is possible with deep learning. The segmentation performance is related to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages and histological types of EOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.