ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
A machine learning approach for preoperatively assessing pulmonary function with computed tomography in patients with lung cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It is clinically important to accurately assess the pulmonary function of patients with lung cancer, especially before surgery. This knowledge can help clinicians to monitor patients pre- and post-surgery, predict the impact of surgery on pulmonary function, and help to optimize postsurgical recovery. We used a deep learning approach for assessing pulmonary function on computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with lung cancer before they underwent surgery. Methods: A total of 188 patients with lung cancer whose diagnoses had been pathologically confirmed were enrolled in this study. We used a software to automatically delineate regions of interest (ROIs) throughout the airways, lobes, and the whole lungs. We then used AK software to extract radiomics features of the 3 types of ROIs. We randomly separated these cases into a training cohort and a test cohort at a ratio of 7:3. We next constructed a logistic regression model to assess pulmonary function from the radiomics features. The machine learning outcomes were compared with established clinical criteria for pulmonary function. including forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), FVC, and maximum vital capacity (VCmax) to evaluate the accuracy of the machine learning model. Results: In the ROIs of the lobes, our results showed that the machine learning model had good performance in predicting FVC and VCmax, attaining a Spearman correlation r value of 0.714 with P<0.001 for FVC and a r value of 0.687 with P<0.001 for VCmax. Using the airway ROIs, our model achieved a r of 0.603 with P=0.001 for VCmax. Using the whole lung ROIs, our model achieved a r of 0.704 with P<0.001 for FVC and a r of 0.693 with P<0.001 for VCmax. Conclusions: Preoperative CT may provide a means for evaluating pulmonary function in patients with lung cancer. With radiomics features extracted from the airway, lobes, and the whole lung region, and a properly trained machine learning model, it is possible to obtain accurate estimation for metrics used in clinical criteria and to offer clinicians imaging-based indicators for the status of pulmonary functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.