ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
A deep learning model for lymph node metastasis prediction based on digital histopathological images of primary endometrial cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The value of machine learning in preoperative identification of lymph node metastasis status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Predictive models for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- Deep learning prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer using Mamba architecture.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in digital pathology diagnosis and analysis: technologies, challenges, and future prospects.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Constructing a prediction model for lymph node metastasis in patients with incidental finding of endometrial cancer based on Fully-Connected Network.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in endometrial cancer: multimodal deep learning and future perspectives in precision gynecologic oncology - a structured narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Histopathology Images-Based Deep Learning Prediction of Histological Types in Endometrial Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Prospects and challenges of deep learning in gynecologic malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Preoperative computed tomography semantic features in predicting lymph node metastasis of part-solid nodules in non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Impact of artificial intelligence on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of endometrial cancer.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- A deep learning framework for predicting endometrial cancer from cytopathologic images with different staining styles.PloS one · 2024Article
- Enhancing clinical decision-making in endometrial cancer through deep learning technology: A review of current research.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) model for prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) based on hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained histopathological images of endometrial cancer (EC). The model was validated using external data. Methods: A total of 2,104 whole slide image (WSI) from 564 patients with pathologically confirmed LNM status were collated from West China Second University Hospital. An artificial intelligence (AI) model was built on the multiple instance-learning (MIL) framework for automatic prediction of the probability of LNM and its performance compared with "Mayo criteria". An additional external data source comprising 533 WSI was collected from two independent medical institutions to validate the model's robustness. Heatmaps were generated to demonstrate regions of the WSI that made the greatest contributions to the DL network output to improve understanding of these processes. Results: The proposed MIL model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.938, a sensitivity of 0.830 and a specificity of 0.911 for LNM prediction to EC. The AUC according to Mayo criteria was 0.666 for the same test dataset. For types I, II and mixed EC, AUCs were 0.927, 0.979 and 0.929, respectively. The predictive performance of the MIL model also achieved an AUC of 0.921 for early staging. In external validation data, the proposed model achieved an AUC of 0.770, a sensitivity of 0.814 and a specificity of 0.520 for LNM prediction. AUCs were 0.783 for type I and 0.818 for early stage EC. Conclusions: The proposed MIL model generated from histopathological images of EC has a much better LNM predictive performance than that of Mayo criteria. A novel DL-based biomarker trained on different histological subtypes of EC slides was revealed to predict metastatic status with improved accuracy, especially for early staging patients. The current study proves the concept of MIL-based prediction of LNM in EC for the first time, and brought a new sight to improve the accuracy of LNM prediction. Multicenter prospective validation data is required to further confirm the clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.