Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915334›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

A deep learning model for lymph node metastasis prediction based on digital histopathological images of primary endometrial cancer.

Min Feng, Yu Zhao, Jie Chen, Tingyu Zhao, Juan Mei, Yingying Fan, Zhenyu Lin, Jianhua Yao, Hong Bu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Min Feng *Department of Pathology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University & Key Laboratory of Birth Defect and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.
Yu Zhao *AI Lab, Tencent, Shenzhen, China.
Jie ChenLaboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Tingyu ZhaoLaboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Juan MeiLaboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yingying FanDepartment of Pathology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University & Key Laboratory of Birth Defect and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.
Zhenyu LinAI Lab, Tencent, Shenzhen, China.
Jianhua Yao *AI Lab, Tencent, Shenzhen, China.
Hong Bu *Laboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNTencent (China) · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The current study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) model for prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) based on hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained histopathological images of endometrial cancer (EC). The model was validated using external data. Methods: A total of 2,104 whole slide image (WSI) from 564 patients with pathologically confirmed LNM status were collated from West China Second University Hospital. An artificial intelligence (AI) model was built on the multiple instance-learning (MIL) framework for automatic prediction of the probability of LNM and its performance compared with "Mayo criteria". An additional external data source comprising 533 WSI was collected from two independent medical institutions to validate the model's robustness. Heatmaps were generated to demonstrate regions of the WSI that made the greatest contributions to the DL network output to improve understanding of these processes. Results: The proposed MIL model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.938, a sensitivity of 0.830 and a specificity of 0.911 for LNM prediction to EC. The AUC according to Mayo criteria was 0.666 for the same test dataset. For types I, II and mixed EC, AUCs were 0.927, 0.979 and 0.929, respectively. The predictive performance of the MIL model also achieved an AUC of 0.921 for early staging. In external validation data, the proposed model achieved an AUC of 0.770, a sensitivity of 0.814 and a specificity of 0.520 for LNM prediction. AUCs were 0.783 for type I and 0.818 for early stage EC. Conclusions: The proposed MIL model generated from histopathological images of EC has a much better LNM predictive performance than that of Mayo criteria. A novel DL-based biomarker trained on different histological subtypes of EC slides was revealed to predict metastatic status with improved accuracy, especially for early staging patients. The current study proves the concept of MIL-based prediction of LNM in EC for the first time, and brought a new sight to improve the accuracy of LNM prediction. Multicenter prospective validation data is required to further confirm the clinical utility.

Indexed as

deep learning modelEndometrial cancer (EC)lymph node metastasis (LNM)prediction

Identifiers

PMID36915334
PMCPMC10006118
OpenAlexW4313823263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.