ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
New 3D phase-unwrapping method based on voxel clustering and local polynomial modeling: application to quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A new 3D phase unwrapping method by region partitioning and local polynomial modeling in abdominal quantitative susceptibility mapping.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To develop an accurate and robust 3-dimensional (3D) phase-unwrapping method that works effectively in the presence of severe noise, disconnected regions, rapid phase changes, and open-ended lines for quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). Methods: We developed a 3D phase-unwrapping method based on voxel clustering and local polynomial modeling named CLOSE3D, which firstly explores the 26-neighborhood to calculate local variation of the phasor and the phase, and then according to the local variation of the phasor, clusters the phase data into easy-to-unwrap blocks and difficult-to-unwrap residual voxels. Next, CLOSE3D sequentially performs intrablock, interblock, and residual-voxel unwrapping by using the region-growing local polynomial modeling method. CLOSED3D was evaluated in simulation and using Results: The simulation experiments showed that CLOSE3D achieved accurate phase-unwrapping results with a mean error ratio <0.39%, even in the presence of serious noise, disconnected regions, and rapid phase changes. The error ratios of region-growing (P=0.000 and P=0.000) and region-expanding labeling for unwrapping estimates (P=0.007, P=0.014) methods were both significantly higher than that of CLOSE3D, when the noise level was ≥60%. The results of the Conclusions: CLOSE3D achieves phase unwrapping with high accuracy and robustness, which will help phase-related 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications such as QSM and susceptibility weighted imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.