Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915250›Full record

Observational studyCancer research and treatment2023

Early Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA as a Potential Biomarker of Disease Recurrence in Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Xiaochen Fei, Xinxing Du, Yiming Gong, Jiazhou Liu, Liancheng Fan, Jiayi Wang, Yanqing Wang, Yinjie Zhu, Jiahua Pan, Baijun Dong and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Current Status and Future Perspectives of Molecular Residual Disease Testing in Genitourinary Cancers.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Update on Liquid Biopsy.Radiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaochen FeiDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xinxing DuDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yiming GongDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiazhou LiuDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Liancheng FanDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiayi WangDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yanqing WangDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yinjie ZhuDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiahua PanDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Baijun DongDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei XueDepartment of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNRenji Hospital · CN

Funding

EPA EP-C-16-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn non-metastatic prostate cancer (nmPCa) setting, it is important to early identify the patients at risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) for immediate postoperative intervention. Our study aimed to evaluate the potential clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for predicting disease recurrence. Materials and Methods: This real-world observational study evaluated 161 cases of nmPCa undergoing next-generation sequencing at our institution. A total of 139 ctDNA samples and 31 biopsied tumor tissue underwent genomic profiling. The study endpoint was BCR after radical prostatectomy. Relationships between the ctDNA status and the biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) were analyzed by log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression.

resultsOf 161 enrolled patients, 19 (11.8%) harbored deleterious alterations in NCOR2, followed by BRCA2 (3.7%), ATR (2.5%), and CDK12 (2.5%). Of available pre-operative blood samples (n=139), ctDNA was detectable in 91 (65.5%). Until last follow-up, 56 of 68 patients (85.3%) with detectable ctDNA had achieved BCR, whereas only eight of 39 patients (20.5%) with undetectable ctDNA had achieved BCR. Patients who had undetectable ctDNA experienced significantly longer bPFS compared with those who had detectable ctDNA (not available vs. 8.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.14; p < 0.01). Pre-operative ctDNA status was a significant prognostic factor of disease recurrence.

conclusionPre-operative ctDNA detection could identify patients at high risk of recurrence and has the potential to inform immediate postoperative interventions, but these approaches remain to be validated in prospective studies. ctDNA studies can provide insights into accurate monitoring and precise treatment rather than simply following routine clinical care.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNABiomarkersCirculating tumor DNAProstatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36915250
PMCPMC10372593
OpenAlexW4322753244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.