ArticleCancer research and treatment2023
Overview of the National Cancer Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer in Korea over 14 Years (2004-2017).
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- From "When" to "Ready": Preparing for Primary Colonoscopy in the Korean National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Emerging trends in the global burden of colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- A Validation Study of Methylated Syndecan-2 in Stool DNA for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Psoriasis and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Korea.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stool DNA-based SDC2 Methylation Test for the Screening of Colorectal Neoplasia in an Asymptomatic, Average-Risk Population.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026Article
- Current Status of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea: History, Achievements, and Future Directions.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2025Article
- Association Between Suicidal Ideation and Cancer Screening Uptake: Results from Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Korea.Cancers · 2025Article
- Trends in Cancer-Screening Rates in Korea: Findings from the National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2023.Cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in Reducing Colorectal Cancer Mortality.Cancers · 2024Article
- Article
- Serum bilirubin levels and risk of colorectal cancer in Korean adults: results from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study-Health Examinee (KoGES-HEXA) Cohort Study.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- National cancer screening program for colorectal cancer in Korea.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the participation and follow-up test compliance rates and key performance indicators of the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) for colorectal cancer (CRC) from 2004 to 2017. Materials and Methods: The overall outcomes of the NCSP for CRC were analyzed using the NCSP data collected from 2004 to 2017 and the Korean Central Cancer Registry for CRC from 2005 to 2017. We cross-sectionally analyzed the participation and follow-up test compliance rates and performance indicators for each year. The trend of participation rates as an annual percentage change was assessed, and other statistical analyses were performed.
resultsThe screening participation rates increased from 7.3% in 2004 to 30.5% in 2017. Additionally, the screening rates were higher among individuals aged 60-69 years and National Health Insurance Service beneficiaries of low-income status. However, the adherence to the follow-up test decreased from 63% in 2004 to 32% in 2017. The follow-up tests using the double-contrast barium enema method decreased from 42.2% in 2004 to 0.3% in 2017. However, follow-up tests by colonoscopy increased from 21.0% in 2004 to 31.8% in 2017. Furthermore, the positivity, false-positive, and interval CRC rates decreased, whereas the specificity increased from 2004 to 2016, indicating improved performance of CRC.
conclusionThe participation rates and performance of the NCSP for CRC have steadily improved, whereas adherence to follow-up tests has decreased. Additionally, there is a rapid growth in colonoscopy volume as a follow-up test. Continued efforts are required to improve the follow-up rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.