Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915185›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2023

The P323L substitution in the SARS-CoV-2 polymerase (NSP12) confers a selective advantage during infection.

Hannah Goldswain, Xiaofeng Dong, Rebekah Penrice-Randal, Muhannad Alruwaili, Ghada T Shawli, Tessa Prince, Maia Kavanagh Williamson, Jayna Raghwani, Nadine Randle, Benjamin Jones and 20 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Hannah Goldswain *Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Xiaofeng Dong *Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Rebekah Penrice-Randal *Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Muhannad Alruwaili *Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ghada T Shawli *Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Tessa Prince *Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Maia Kavanagh Williamson *School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jayna Raghwani *Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nadine RandleInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Benjamin JonesInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
I'ah Donovan-BanfieldInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Francisco J SalgueroUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK.
Julia A TreeUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK.
Yper HallUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK.
Catherine HartleyInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Maximilian ErdmannSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
James BazireSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Tuksin JearanaiwitayakulSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Malcolm G SempleInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Peter J M OpenshawNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
J Kenneth BaillieThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
ISARIC4C Investigators
Stevan R EmmettRoyal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Paul DigardThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David A MatthewsSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lance TurtleInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alistair C DarbyInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew D DavidsonSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Miles W CarrollNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Julian A HiscoxInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. julian.hiscox@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6582-0275
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBRoslin Institute · GBImperial College London · GBAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGMahidol University · THUK Health Security Agency · GBNorthern Border University · SAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013740/1Department of Health 200907Department of Health CO‑CIN‑01Medical Research Council MC_PC_19059Medical Research Council MR/S020039/1Medical Research Council MR/V027506/1Medical Research Council MR/W005611/1Wellcome Trust 205228/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mutational landscape of SARS-CoV-2 varies at the dominant viral genome sequence and minor genomic variant population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, an early substitution in the genome was the D614G change in the spike protein, associated with an increase in transmissibility. Genomes with D614G are accompanied by a P323L substitution in the viral polymerase (NSP12). However, P323L is not thought to be under strong selective pressure.

resultsInvestigation of P323L/D614G substitutions in the population shows rapid emergence during the containment phase and early surge phase during the first wave. These substitutions emerge from minor genomic variants which become dominant viral genome sequence. This is investigated in vivo and in vitro using SARS-CoV-2 with P323 and D614 in the dominant genome sequence and L323 and G614 in the minor variant population. During infection, there is rapid selection of L323 into the dominant viral genome sequence but not G614. Reverse genetics is used to create two viruses (either P323 or L323) with the same genetic background. L323 shows greater abundance of viral RNA and proteins and a smaller plaque morphology than P323.

conclusionsThese data suggest that P323L is an important contribution in the emergence of variants with transmission advantages. Sequence analysis of viral populations suggests it may be possible to predict the emergence of a new variant based on tracking the frequency of minor variant genomes. The ability to predict an emerging variant of SARS-CoV-2 in the global landscape may aid in the evaluation of medical countermeasures and non-pharmaceutical interventions.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Genetic BackgroundGenome, ViralHumansMutationPandemicsCOVID-19EvolutionNSP12P323LPolymeraseSARS-CoV-2SelectionSpike protein

Identifiers

PMID36915185
PMCPMC10009825
OpenAlexW4324129678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read58
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.