Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915167›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2023

Strategies of pretreatment of feedstocks for optimized bioethanol production: distinct and integrated approaches.

Akanksha Shukla, Deepak Kumar, Madhuri Girdhar, Anil Kumar, Abhineet Goyal, Tabarak Malik, Anand Mohan

Open access · goldFull text readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Akanksha ShuklaSchool of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, 144411, India.
Deepak KumarSchool of Chemical Engineering and Physical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, 144411, India.
Madhuri GirdharSchool of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, 144411, India.
Anil KumarGene Regulation Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, 110067, India.
Abhineet GoyalSAGE School of Science, SAGE University Bhopal, Sahara Bypass Road Katara Hills, Extension, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462022, India.
Tabarak MalikDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. malikitrc@gmail.com.
Anand MohanSchool of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, 144411, India. anandmohan77@gmail.com.
Lovely Professional University · INJimma University · ETNational Institute of Immunology · INSage (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioethanol is recognized as a valuable substitute for renewable energy sources to meet the fuel and energy demand of the nation, considered an environmentally friendly resource obtained from agricultural residues such as sugarcane bagasse, rice straw, husk, wheat straw and corn stover. The energy demand is sustained using lignocellulosic biomass to produce bioethanol. Lignocellulosic biomass (LCBs) is the point of attention in replacing the dependence on fossil fuels. The recalcitrant structure of the lignocellulosic biomass is disrupted using effective pretreatment techniques that separate complex interlinked structures among cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Pretreatment of biomass involves various physical, chemical, biological, and physiochemical protocols which are of importance, dependent upon their individual or combined dissolution effect. Physical pretreatment involves a reduction in the size of the biomass using mechanical, extrusion, irradiation, and sonification methods while chemical pretreatment involves the breaking of various bonds present in the LCB structure. This can be obtained by using an acidic, alkaline, ionic liquid, and organosolvent methods. Biological pretreatment is considered an environment-friendly and safe process involving various bacterial and fungal microorganisms. Distinct pretreatment methods, when combined and utilized in synchronization lead to more effective disruption of LCB, making biomass more accessible for further processing. These could be utilized in terms of their effectiveness for a particular type of cellulosic fiber and are namely steam explosion, liquid hot water, ammonia fibre explosion, CO

Indexed as

BioethanolBiofuelsBiological pretreatmentChemical pretreatmentLignocellulosic structurePhysical pretreatment

Identifiers

PMID36915167
PMCPMC10012730
OpenAlexW4324056232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read479
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.