Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915144›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Angiotensin 1-7 in an experimental septic shock model.

Bruno Garcia, Fuhong Su, Francesca Manicone, Laurence Dewachter, Raphaël Favory, Amina Khaldi, Alexander Moiroux-Sahroui, Anthony Moreau, Antoine Herpain, Jean-Louis Vincent and 3 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Vasopressors in septic shock: the old and the new].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Angiotensin-(1-7) decreases inflammation and lung damage caused by betacoronavirus infection in mice.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruno GarciaExperimental Laboratory of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. br.garcia@icloud.com.
Fuhong SuExperimental Laboratory of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Francesca ManiconeExperimental Laboratory of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Laurence DewachterLaboratory of Physiology and Pharmacology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Raphaël FavoryDepartment of Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.
Amina KhaldiExperimental Laboratory of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Alexander Moiroux-SahrouiExperimental Laboratory of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Anthony MoreauExperimental Laboratory of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Antoine HerpainExperimental Laboratory of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Jacques CreteurDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Fabio Silvio TacconeExperimental Laboratory of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Filippo AnnoniExperimental Laboratory of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlterations in the renin-angiotensin system have been implicated in the pathophysiology of septic shock. In particular, angiotensin 1-7 (Ang-(1-7)), an anti-inflammatory heptapeptide, has been hypothesized to have beneficial effects. The aim of the present study was to test the effects of Ang-(1-7) infusion on the development and severity of septic shock.

methodsThis randomized, open-label, controlled study was performed in 14 anesthetized and mechanically ventilated sheep. Immediately after sepsis induction by bacterial peritonitis, animals received either Ang-(1-7) (n = 7) or placebo (n = 7) intravenously. Fluid resuscitation, antimicrobial therapy, and peritoneal lavage were initiated 4 h after sepsis induction. Norepinephrine administration was titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 65 and 75 mmHg.

resultsThere were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Septic shock was prevented in 6 of the 7 animals in the Ang-(1-7) group at the end of the 24-h period. Fluid balance and MAP were similar in the two groups; however, MAP was achieved with a mean norepinephrine dose of 0.4 μg/kg/min in the Ang-(1-7) group compared to 4.3 μg/kg/min in the control group. Heart rate and cardiac output index were lower in the Ang (1-7) than in the control group, as were plasma interleukin-6 levels, and creatinine levels. Platelet count and PaO

conclusionsIn this experimental septic shock model, early Ang-(1-7) infusion prevented the development of septic shock, reduced norepinephrine requirements, limited interleukine-6 increase and prevented renal dysfunction.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticAngiotensin IAnimalsNorepinephrinePeptide FragmentsSheepAngiotensin Iangiotensin I (1-7)NorepinephrinePeptide FragmentsAngiotensin (1–7)Circulatory failureInflammationRenin-angiotensin systemVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID36915144
PMCPMC10010236
OpenAlexW4324054963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read28
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.