Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915140›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2023

Are standing osmotic gradients the main driver of cerebrospinal fluid production? A computational analysis.

Pooya Razzaghi Khamesi, Vasileios Charitatos, Eva K Heerfordt, Nanna MacAulay, Vartan Kurtcuoglu

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The NaAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pooya Razzaghi KhamesiThe Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Vasileios CharitatosThe Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eva K HeerfordtDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nanna MacAulayDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vartan KurtcuogluThe Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland. vartan.kurtcuoglu@uzh.ch.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF17OC0024718Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 205321_182683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mechanisms of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) production by the ventricular choroid plexus (ChP) have not been fully deciphered. One prominent hypothesized mechanism is trans-epithelial water transport mediated by accumulation of solutes at the luminal ChP membrane that produces local osmotic gradients. However, this standing osmotic gradient hypothesis has not been systematically tested.

methodsTo assess the plausibility of the standing gradient mechanism serving as the main driver of CSF production by the ChP, we developed a three-dimensional (3D) and a one-dimensional (1D) computational model to quantitatively describe the associated processes in the rat ChP inter-microvillar spaces and in CSF pools between macroscopic ChP folds (1D only). The computationally expensive 3D model was used to examine the applicability of the 1D model for hypothesis testing. The 1D model was employed to predict the rate of CSF produced by the standing gradient mechanism for 200,000 parameter permutations. Model parameter values for each permutation were chosen by random sampling from distributions derived from published experimental data.

resultsBoth models predict that the CSF production rate by the standing osmotic gradient mechanism is below 10% of experimentally measured values that reflect the contribution of all actual production mechanisms. The 1D model indicates that increasing the size of CSF pools between ChP folds, where diffusion dominates solute transport, would increase the contribution of the standing gradient mechanism to CSF production.

conclusionsThe models suggest that the effect of standing osmotic gradients is too small to contribute substantially to CSF production. ChP motion and movement of CSF in the ventricles, which are not accounted for in the models, would further reduce this effect, making it unlikely that standing osmotic gradients are the main drivers of CSF production.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal FluidChoroid PlexusAnimalsBiological TransportRatsChoroid plexusComputational modelingCSF production

Identifiers

PMID36915140
PMCPMC10012606
OpenAlexW4324054969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.