Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915134›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2023

Free-living core body temperature monitoring using a wrist-worn sensor after COVID-19 booster vaccination: a pilot study.

Samuel Etienne, Ruben Oliveras, Giovanni Schiboni, Lukas Durrer, Fabien Rochat, Philipp Eib, Michele Zahner, Michael Osthoff, Stefano Bassetti, Jens Eckstein

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel EtienneDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. samuel.etienne@usb.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6142-8946
Ruben OliverasgreenTEG AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Giovanni SchibonigreenTEG AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lukas DurrergreenTEG AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fabien RochatgreenTEG AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philipp EibgreenTEG AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michele ZahnergreenTEG AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael OsthoffDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Stefano BassettiDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Jens EcksteinDivision of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. jens.eckstein@usb.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1693-9851
GREEN Tox (Switzerland) · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Core body temperature (CBT) is a key vital sign and fever is an important indicator of disease. In the past decade, there has been growing interest for vital sign monitoring technology that may be embedded in wearable devices, and the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for remote patient monitoring systems. While wrist-worn sensors allow continuous assessment of heart rate and oxygen saturation, reliable measurement of CBT at the wrist remains challenging. In this study, CBT was measured continuously in a free-living setting using a novel technology worn at the wrist and compared to reference core body temperature measurements, i.e., CBT values acquired with an ingestible temperature-sensing pill. Fifty individuals who received the COVID-19 booster vaccination were included. The datasets of 33 individuals were used to develop the CBT prediction algorithm, and the algorithm was then validated on the datasets of 17 participants. Mean observation time was 26.4 h and CBT > 38.0 °C occurred in 66% of the participants. CBT predicted by the wrist-worn sensor showed good correlation to the reference CBT (r = 0.72). Bland-Altman statistics showed an average bias of 0.11 °C of CBT predicted by the wrist-worn device compared to reference CBT, and limits of agreement were - 0.67 to + 0.93 °C, which is comparable to the bias and limits of agreement of commonly used tympanic membrane thermometers. The small size of the components needed for this technology would allow its integration into a variety of wearable monitoring systems assessing other vital signs and at the same time allowing maximal freedom of movement to the user.

Indexed as

COVID-19WristBody TemperatureHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicPandemicsPilot ProjectsCore body temperatureCOVID-19 pandemicFeverFree-livingRemote monitoringSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineWearable monitoringWearable sensorWrist-worn sensor

Identifiers

PMID36915134
PMCPMC10010220
OpenAlexW4324045735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read24
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.