Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915120›Full record

ArticleAnnals of general psychiatry2023

Participation in leisure activities and quality of life of people with psychosis in England: a multi-site cross-sectional study.

Kayonda Hubert Ngamaba, Martin Webber, Penny Xanthopoulou, Agnes Chevalier, Domenico Giacco

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of general psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Occupational Priorities of People on Hemodialysis Who Participated in Energy Management Education.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kayonda Hubert NgamabaInternational Centre for Mental Health Social Research (ICMHSR), School for Business and Society, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. Kayonda.ngamaba@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1227-7990
Martin WebberInternational Centre for Mental Health Social Research (ICMHSR), School for Business and Society, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-1376
Penny XanthopoulouMental Health Research Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, College House (1.05), St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK.
Agnes ChevalierUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Service Development), Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newham Centre for Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, E13 8SP, UK.
Domenico GiaccoUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Service Development), Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newham Centre for Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, E13 8SP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-8800
Centre for Mental Health · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Programme Grants for Applied Research RP-PG-0615-20009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeisure activities can improve quality of life in the general population. For people with psychosis, negative symptoms (e.g. being unmotivated, difficulty in sticking with activities) are often a barrier to engaging in social leisure activities. However, we do not know if participation in leisure activities is associated with quality of life in this group and, whether psychosocial interventions should aim to increase leisure activities.

aimThis study investigates participation in social leisure activities of people with psychosis and whether their participation is associated with better quality of life.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in 6 NHS mental health trusts. Adults aged 18-65 (N = 533) with a diagnosis of a psychosis-related condition (ICD-10 F20-29) were recruited from outpatient secondary mental health services. Several measures were used including an adapted version of the Time Use Survey (TUS), the Social contacts assessment (SCA) and Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). A Structural Equation Model (SEM) was used to explore the relationships between participation in leisure activities and quality of life, and whether social contacts mediated the link.

resultsParticipants attended an average of 2.42 (SD = 1.47) leisure activities in the last 7 days. Their quality of life increased with the number of leisure activities they attended. Participation in leisure activities was positively associated with quality of life in people with psychosis (B = 0.104, SE = 0.051, p = 0.042, 95% CI [0.003 to 0.204]). Leisure activities predicted social contacts, but the link between social contacts and the quality of life was not significant. After controlling for sociodemographic factors, being female and unemployed were negatively linked with quality of life (B = - 0.101, SE = 0.048, p = 0.036, 95% CI [- 0.196 to - 0.006; B = - 0.207, SE = 0.050, p = 0.001, 95% CI [- 0.305 to - 0.108, respectively].

conclusionPeople with psychosis who attend more leisure activities have a higher quality of life. Quality of life was lower amongst female and unemployed participants who attended leisure activities. Intervention which helps improve participation in leisure activities may be beneficial for people with psychosis. Trial registration number ISRCTN15815862.

Indexed as

Diagnosis of psychosisLeisure activitiesMental healthQuality of lifeSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID36915120
PMCPMC10009983
OpenAlexW4324066845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read92
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.