Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915089›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Implementation through translation: a qualitative case study of translation processes in the implementation of quality improvement collaboratives.

Kathrine Carstensen, Anne Mette Kjeldsen, Stina Lou, Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathrine CarstensenPublic Health Research, Central Denmark Region, Department of Public Health, DEFACTUM, Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Alle 15, Aarhus N, DK-8200, Denmark. katcar@rm.dk.
Anne Mette KjeldsenDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 7, Aarhus C, DK-8000, Denmark.
Stina LouPublic Health Research, Central Denmark Region, Department of Clinical Medicine, DEFACTUM, Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Alle 15, Aarhus N, DK-8200, Denmark.
Camilla Palmhøj NielsenPublic Health Research, Central Denmark Region, Department of Public Health, DEFACTUM, Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Alle 15, Aarhus N, DK-8200, Denmark.

Funding

Aarhus University, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Denmark Not applicableDEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Denmark Not applicableDepartment of Political Science, Aarhus University, Denmark Not applicable.Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region A2075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality improvement collaboratives (QICs) are used extensively to implement quality improvement in healthcare, and current research is demonstrating positive yet varying evidence. To interpret the effectiveness results, it is necessary to illuminate the dynamics of QIC implementation in specific contexts. Using Scandinavian institutionalist translation theory as a theoretical framework, this study aims to make two contributions. First, we provide insights into the dynamics of the translation processes inherent in QIC implementation. Second, we discuss the implications of the translation processes as experienced by participating actors.

methodsWe used empirical data from a qualitative case study investigating the implementation of QICs as an approach to quality improvement within a national Danish healthcare quality program. We included two diverse QICs to allow for exploration of the significance of organizational complexity for the translation processes. Data comprised qualitative interviews, participant observation and documentary material.

resultsTranslation was an inherent part of QIC implementation. Key actors at different organizational levels engaged in translation of their implementation roles, and the QIC content and methodology. They drew on different translation strategies and practices that mainly materialized as kinds of modification. The translations were motivated by deliberate, strategic, and pragmatic rationales, contingent on combinations of features of the actors' organizational contexts, and the transformability and organizational complexity of the QICs. The findings point to a transformative power of translation, as different translations led to various regional and local QIC versions. Furthermore, the findings indicate that translation affects the outcomes of the implementation process and the QIC intervention. Translation may positively affect the institutionalization of the QICs and the creation of professional engagement and negatively influence the QIC effects.

conclusionThe findings extends the current research concerning the understanding of the dynamics of the translation processes embedded in the local implementation of QICs, and thus constitute a valuable contribution to a more sustainable and effective implementation of QICs in healthcare improvement. For researchers and practitioners, this highlights translation as an embedded part of the QIC implementation process, and encourages detailed attention to the implications of translation for both organizational institutionalization and realisation of the expected intervention outcomes.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorQuality ImprovementDelivery of Health CareHealth FacilitiesHumansQualitative ResearchHealth CareImplementationQuality improvement collaborativesTranslation

Identifiers

PMID36915089
PMCPMC10009851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read14
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.