Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915080›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2023

Centering and collaborating with community knowledge systems: piloting a novel participatory modeling approach.

Yahya Shaikh, Muzamillah Jeelani, Michael Christopher Gibbons, Denisa Livingston, David Rudyard Williams, Sanith Wijesinghe, Jenine Patterson, Sybil Russell

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yahya ShaikhThe MITRE Corp, 2275 Rolling Run Dr, Windsor Mill, Woodlawn, MD, 21244, USA. yshaikh@mitre.org.
Muzamillah JeelaniInternational Islamic University of Malaysia, Jalan Gombak, 53100, Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Malaysia.
Michael Christopher GibbonsThe Greystone Group, Inc, 9900 Greenbelt Rd, STE E103, Lanham, MD, 20706, USA.
Denisa LivingstonStrategic Ancestors, PO Box 235, Fruitland, NM, 87416, USA.
David Rudyard WilliamsHarvard University, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Sanith WijesingheThe MITRE Corp, 7525 Colshire Dr, McLean, VA, 22102, USA.
Jenine PattersonThe MITRE Corp, 7525 Colshire Dr, McLean, VA, 22102, USA.
Sybil RussellThe MITRE Corp, 2275 Rolling Run Dr, Windsor Mill, Woodlawn, MD, 21244, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystems science approaches like simulation modeling can offer an opportunity for community voice to shape policies. In the episteme of many communities there are elders, leaders, and researchers who are seen as bearers of historic knowledge and can contextualize and interpret contemporary research using knowledge systems of the community. There is a need for a systematic methodology to collaborate with community Knowledge Bearers and Knowledge Interpreters. In this paper we report the results of piloting a systematic methodology for collaborating with a community Knowledge-Bearer and Knowledge-Interpreter to develop a conceptual model revealing the local-level influences and architecture of systems shaping community realities. The use case for this pilot is 'persistent poverty' in the United States, specifically within the inner-city African American community in Baltimore City.

methodsThis pilot of a participatory modeling approach was conducted over a span of 7 sessions and included the following steps, each with an associated script: Step 1: Knowledge-Bearer and Knowledge-Interpreter recruitment Step 2: Relationship building Step 3: Session introduction, Vignette development & enrichment Step 4: Vignette analysis & constructing architecture of systems map Step 5: Augmenting architecture of systems map

resultsEach step of the participatory modeling approach resulted in artifacts that were valuable for both the communities and the research effort. Vignette construction resulted in narratives representing a spectrum of lived experiences, trajectories, and outcomes within a community. The collaborative analysis of vignettes yielded the Architecture of Systemic Factors map, that revealed how factors inter-relate to form a system in which lived experience of poverty occurs. A literature search provided an opportunity for the community to contextualize existing research about them using realities of lived experience.

conclusionThis methodology showed that a community Knowledge Bearer can function as communicators and interpreters of their community's knowledge base, can develop coherent narratives of lived experiences within which research and knowledge is contextualized, and can collaboratively construct conceptual mappings necessary for simulation modeling. This participatory modeling approach showed that even if there already exists a vast body of research about a community, collaborating with community gives context to that research and brings together disparate findings within narratives of lived experience.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchKnowledgeNarrationBaltimoreBlack or African AmericanHumansCollaborationCollaborative researchCommunityDisparitiesEpistemic violenceEquityMarginalizationOtheringParticipatory modelingVoice

Identifiers

PMID36915080
PMCPMC10010640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.