Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915066›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

The effect of a digital-assisted group rehabilitation on clinical and functional outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty-a prospective randomized controlled pilot study.

Judith Osterloh, Franziska Knaack, Rainer Bader, Martin Behrens, Juliana Peschers, Lisa Nawrath, Philipp Bergschmidt, Martin Darowski

Full text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Judith Osterloh *Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany. judith.osterloh@med.uni-rostock.de.
Franziska Knaack *Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Rainer BaderDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Martin BehrensDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Juliana PeschersVital & Physio GmbH, Rostock, Germany.
Lisa NawrathVital & Physio GmbH, Rostock, Germany.
Philipp BergschmidtDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Martin DarowskiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rising number of total hip and knee arthroplasties and the decreasing availability of physiotherapists require clinically and economically effective rehabilitation approaches. Therefore, the present pilot study investigated the effect of a novel digital-assisted individualized group rehabilitation program on clinical and functional outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

methodsIn this randomized controlled pilot study, 26 patients undergoing total knee or hip replacement were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (IG, novel digital-assisted group therapy) or the control group (CG, standard postoperative physiotherapy currently carried out in Germany). The IG received the novel digital-assisted group therapy twice per week for a six-months period, while the CG received individual outpatient therapy depending on the prescription of the supervising physician. The number of therapy sessions was recorded. Moreover, subjective outcomes (EuroQol-5Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)), functional outcome (30 s sit to stand test and timed up and go test (TUG)), as well as gait parameters were quantified preoperatively as well as at three and six months after surgery. Data were analyzed using an analysis of covariance with baseline-adjustment.

resultsNo patient-reported falls, pain, and hospital readmissions were recorded. On average, the IG received more therapy sessions. The clinical and functional outcomes were mainly not significantly different between groups at three- and six-months follow-up, but medium to large effect sizes for the differences in quality of life (EQ-5D) as well as pain, stiffness, and physical function (WOMAC), and TUG performance were observed in favor of the IG. However, the IG showed a higher variability of gait velocity after total joint replacement.

conclusionThe digital-assisted rehabilitation had positive effects on quality of life, pain, stiffness, physical function, and TUG performance. Nevertheless, the therapy concept may be improved by adding exercises focusing on gait performance to reduce gait variability. The results indicate that the digital-assisted therapy concept is effective and safe. Therefore, a consecutive full-scaled randomized controlled clinical trial is recommended.

trial registrationThis study was retrospectively registered on 14/02/2022 in the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00027960).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansPainPilot ProjectsPostural BalanceProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTime and Motion StudiesTreatment OutcomeDigitalizationEndoprosthesisMonitor-based therapyPhysiotherapyPostoperative rehabilitationTotal hip replacementTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID36915066
PMCPMC10010966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read43
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.