Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915064›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2023

The effect of anti-coagulation dosage on the outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Ethiopia: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.

Abel Girma Tessema, Zekarias Masresha Mengiste, Tsegaye Gebreyes Hundie, Hailemichael Getachew Yosef, Dawit Kebede Huluka, Abebaw Bekele Seyoum, Hannibal Kassahun Abate, Rawleigh Craig Howe

Open access · goldFull text readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abel Girma TessemaArmauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. abelgirma642@gmail.com.
Zekarias Masresha MengisteArmauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tsegaye Gebreyes HundieEka-Kotebe General Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Hailemichael Getachew YosefArmauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dawit Kebede HulukaAddis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abebaw Bekele SeyoumEka-Kotebe General Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Hannibal Kassahun AbateAddis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Rawleigh Craig HoweArmauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Armauer Hansen Research Institute · ETAddis Ababa University · ETKotebe University of Education · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have indicated that hospitalized COVID-19 patients benefit from anticoagulation therapy in terms of survival; however, there is an ongoing controversy over the optimum anticoagulant dosage. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between patients who received prophylactic anticoagulation and those who received therapeutic anticoagulation.

methodsA multi-center retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the impact of anticoagulation dosage in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Ethiopia. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, and it was assessed using multivariable binary logistic regression and covariate-adjusted Cox Proportional Hazard model. For critical and severe COVID-19 patients, subgroup analyses were performed using multivariable binary logistic regression model and multivariable Cox regression models.

resultA total of 472 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were included in this study, of whom 235 (49.8%) received therapeutic anticoagulation and 237 (50.2%) received prophylactic dose. The demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were roughly similar between the groups. After adjustment for several confounders, in critical COVID-19 subgroup, therapeutic dose of anticoagulation was significantly associated with a higher inpatient mortality (AOR 2.27, 95% CI, 1.18-4.35, p = 0.013), whereas in severe COVID-19 subgroup, anticoagulation dosage was not associated with inpatient mortality (OR, 1.02, 95% CI, 0.45 - 2.33, p = 0.958). In severe COVID-19 patient group however, the incidence of thrombosis was slightly lower in the therapeutic group as compared with prophylactic group although the difference was not statistically significant (AOR 0.15, 95% CI, 0.02 - 1.20, p = 0.073). Although there were only six major bleeding events in this study, all these were recorded from patients in the therapeutic subgroup, making the difference statistically significant (p = 0.013).

conclusionAlthough this study is limited by its observational design, our results are not consistent with current recommendations on anti-coagulation dose for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, necessitating the need for RCT in resource limited settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnticoagulantsEthiopiaHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2AnticoagulantsAnticoagulationBleedingCOVID-19EnoxaparinEthiopiaHeparinThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID36915064
PMCPMC10010242
OpenAlexW4324099025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read124
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.