Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36915034›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2023

Prehospital clinical practice guidelines for unintentional injuries: a scoping review and prioritisation process.

Desmond Kuupiel, Nasreen S Jessani, Jody Boffa, Celeste Naude, Emmy De Buck, Philippe Vandekerckhove, Michael McCaul

Full text readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The impact of receiving hospitals on the management and outcomes of injured patients in traffic accidents causing mass casualty incidents.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Desmond KuupielDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7530, South Africa. desmondkuupiel98@hotmail.com.
Nasreen S JessaniCentre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7530, South Africa.
Jody BoffaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7530, South Africa.
Celeste NaudeDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7530, South Africa.
Emmy De BuckCentre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Motstraat 42, 2800, Mechelen, Belgium.
Philippe VandekerckhoveDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7530, South Africa.
Michael McCaulDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, 7530, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, millions of people die and many more develop disabilities resulting from injuries each year. Most people who die from injuries do so before they are transported to hospital. Thus, reliable, pragmatic, and evidence-based prehospital guidance for various injuries is essential. We systematically mapped and described prehospital clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for injuries in the global context, as well as prioritised injury topics for guidance development and adolopment.

methodsThis study was sequentially conducted in three phases: a scoping review for CPGs (Phase I), identification and refinement of gaps in CPGs (Phase II), and ranking and prioritisation of gaps in CPGs (Phase III). For Phase I, we searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Trip Database; guideline repositories and websites up to 23

resultsFifty-eight CPGs were included out of 3,427 guidance documents obtained and screened. 39/58 (67%) were developed de novo compared to 19 that were developed using alternative approaches. Twenty-five out of 58 guidelines (43%) were developed by bodies in countries within the WHO European Region, while only one guideline was targeted to the African context. Twenty-five (43%) CPGs targeted emergency medical service providers, while 13 (22%) targeted first aid providers (laypeople). Forty-three CPGs (74%) targeted people of all ages. The 58 guidance documents contained 32 injury topics. Injuries linked to road traffic accidents such as traumatic brain injuries and chest injuries were among the top prioritised topics for future guideline development by the workshop participants.

conclusionThis study highlights the availability, gaps and priority injury topics for future guideline development/adolopment, especially for the African context. Further research is needed to evaluate the recommendations in the 58 included CPGs for possible adaptation to the African context.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticEmergency Medical ServicesDatabases, FactualHumansClinical practice guidelinesInjuriesPrehospital carePrioritisationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID36915034
PMCPMC10010958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read54
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.