ArticleEndocrine2023
Contraception in women with diabetes: adequacy of medical files registration and prescription - a cross-section study.
Article in Endocrine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the adequacy of diabetes mellitus (DM) patient's files registry regarding contraception method (CM), factors associated with lack of registry, and if prescription is in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) eligibility criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study was developed in two phases: (1) electronic medical records of women with DM who attended the outpatient clinic of a university hospital were reviewed to identify women in reproductive age and to look for CM registration and (2) interviews regarding contraception use, comorbidities and chronic DM complications.
resultsAmong 1069 files analyzed, 313 women with DM in childbearing age were identified. Out of those, 55.3% had a CM registered. Age >40 years, non-white skin color, and ≤11 years of education were associated with no registration. Of the 270 women interviewed, 201 (74.4%) were using CM. Out of the 69 patients not on CM, 51 fertile patients were at risk of an unplanned pregnancy (18.8% of the sample). The most frequently used method was oral hormonal (combined: 34.3%; progestin-only: 17.9%), and 67 (33.3%) were using an inadequate method (WHO eligibility category 3/4).
conclusionOne third of women with DM are in childbearing age. Older age, non-white skin color, and lower education level were associated with lack of CM registration. One-third of respondents were using CM inappropriate for their clinical condition and one-fifth were at risk for an unplanned pregnancy. So, improvements in family planning for women with DM should be instituted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.