ArticleScientific reports2023
The predictive model for COVID-19 pandemic plastic pollution by using deep learning method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A supported decision-making model for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis based on feature screening and optimized neural network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A machine learning-derived angiogenesis signature for clinical prognosis and immunotherapy guidance in colon adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- National trends in dyslipidemia prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control in South Korea from 2005 to 2022.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Responses of natural plastisphere community and zooplankton to microplastic pollution: a review on novel remediation strategies.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- The relationship between error experience and patient safety culture with safe activities of emergency nurses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between body roundness index and weight-adjusted waist index with asthma prevalence among US adults: the NHANES cross-sectional study, 2005-2018.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Quality control of hospitals and its effect on hospitalized fatality rate of COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- COVID-19's influence on Karachi stock exchange: A comparative machine learning algorithms study for forecasting.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Recycled by Catalytic Glycolysis: A Bridge toward Circular Economy Principles.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A supervised machine learning approach for the prediction of antioxidant activities ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Pandemic COVID-19 ends but soil pollution increases: Impacts and a new approach for risk assessment.The Science of the total environment · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pandemic plastics (e.g., masks, gloves, aprons, and sanitizer bottles) are global consequences of COVID-19 pandemic-infected waste, which has increased significantly throughout the world. These hazardous wastes play an important role in environmental pollution and indirectly spread COVID-19. Predicting the environmental impacts of these wastes can be used to provide situational management, conduct control procedures, and reduce the COVID-19 effects. In this regard, the presented study attempted to provide a deep learning-based predictive model for forecasting the expansion of the pandemic plastic in the megacities of Iran. As a methodology, a database was gathered from February 27, 2020, to October 10, 2021, for COVID-19 spread and personal protective equipment usage in this period. The dataset was trained and validated using training (80%) and testing (20%) datasets by a deep neural network (DNN) procedure to forecast pandemic plastic pollution. Performance of the DNN-based model is controlled by the confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and justified by the k-nearest neighbours, decision tree, random forests, support vector machines, Gaussian naïve Bayes, logistic regression, and multilayer perceptron methods. According to the comparative modelling results, the DNN-based model was found to predict more accurately than other methods and have a significant predominance over others with a lower errors rate (MSE = 0.024, RMSE = 0.027, MAPE = 0.025). The ROC curve analysis results (overall accuracy) indicate the DNN model (AUC = 0.929) had the highest score among others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.