Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36914734›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Renal toxicity and biokinetics models after repeated uranium instillation.

Laurie De Castro, Annabelle Manoury, Olivier Claude, Bastien Simoneau, Virginie Monceau, David Suhard, Christelle Elie, Victor Magneron, Laurence Roy, Céline Bouvier-Capely and 3 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurie De CastroInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Annabelle ManouryInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Olivier ClaudeInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Bastien SimoneauInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Virginie MonceauInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
David SuhardInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Christelle ElieInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Victor MagneronInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Laurence RoyInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Céline Bouvier-CapelyInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Chrystelle IbanezInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Estelle DavesneInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Yann GuéguenInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-SANTE, SESANE, B.P. N°17, 92262, Fontenay-Aux-Roses Cedex, France. yann.gueguen@irsn.fr.
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During nuclear fuel processing, workers can potentially be exposed to repeated inhalations of uranium compounds. Uranium nephrotoxicity is well documented after acute uranium intake, but it is controversial after long-term or protracted exposure. This study aims to analyze the nephrotoxicity threshold after repeated uranium exposure through upper airways and to investigate the resulting uranium biokinetics in comparison to reference models. Mice (C57BL/6J) were exposed to uranyl nitrate (0.03-3 mg/kg/day) via intranasal instillation four times a week for two weeks. Concentrations of uranium in urines and tissues were measured at regular time points (from day 1 to 91 post-exposure). At each exposure level, the amount of uranium retained in organs/tissues (kidney, lung, bone, nasal compartment, carcass) and excreta (urine, feces) reflected the two consecutive weeks of instillation except for renal uranium retention for the highest uranium dose. Nephrotoxicity biomarkers, KIM-1, clusterin and osteopontin, are induced from day 4 to day 21 and associated with changes in renal function (arterial fluxes) measured using non-invasive functional imaging (Doppler-ultrasonography) and confirmed by renal histopathological analysis. These results suggest that specific biokinetic models should be developed to consider altered uranium excretion and retention in kidney due to nephrotoxicity. The threshold is between 0.25 and 1 mg/kg/day after repeated exposure to uranium via upper airways.

Indexed as

Body FluidsUraniumAnimalsFecesKidneyMiceMice, Inbred C57BLUranium

Identifiers

PMID36914734
PMCPMC10011524
OpenAlexW4324056319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read138
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.