ArticleScientific reports2023
Stress native T1 and native T2 mapping compared to myocardial perfusion reserve in long-term follow-up of severe Covid-19.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stress native mapping does not distinguish patients with previous myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries from healthy volunteers.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2026Article
- Differentiating ischemic from healthy myocardium using cardiovascular magnetic resonance dipyridamole rest and stress T1 mapping.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging across PET, SPECT, CMR, and CT.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- Long-Term Coronary Microvascular and Cardiac Dysfunction After Severe COVID-19 Hospitalization.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe Covid-19 may cause a cascade of cardiovascular complications beyond viral pneumonia. The severe inflammation may affect the microcirculation which can be assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging using quantitative perfusion mapping and calculation of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). Furthermore, native T1 and T2 mapping have previously been shown to identify changes in myocardial perfusion by the change in native T1 and T2 during adenosine stress. However, the relationship between native T1, native T2, ΔT1 and ΔT2 with myocardial perfusion and MPR during long-term follow-up in severe Covid-19 is currently unknown. Therefore, patients with severe Covid-19 (n = 37, median age 57 years, 24% females) underwent 1.5 T CMR median 292 days following discharge. Quantitative myocardial perfusion (ml/min/g), and native T1 and T2 maps were acquired during adenosine stress, and rest, respectively. Both native T1 (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.