Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36914646›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Abiotic selection of microbial genome size in the global ocean.

David K Ngugi, Silvia G Acinas, Pablo Sánchez, Josep M Gasol, Susana Agusti, David M Karl, Carlos M Duarte

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Yeast adapts to diverse ecological niches driven by genomics and metabolic reprogramming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genomic diversity and functional adaptation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David K NgugiLeibniz Institute DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany. david.ngugi@dsmz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0442-4279
Silvia G AcinasDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3439-0428
Pablo SánchezDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2787-822X
Josep M GasolDepartment of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5238-2387
Susana AgustiKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Red Sea Research Center, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0536-7293
David M KarlDepartment of Oceanography, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaií at Mãnoa, Honolulu, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6660-6721
Carlos M DuarteKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Red Sea Research Center, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1213-1361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strong purifying selection is considered a major evolutionary force behind small microbial genomes in the resource-poor photic ocean. However, very little is currently known about how the size of prokaryotic genomes evolves in the global ocean and whether patterns reflect shifts in resource availability in the epipelagic and relatively stable deep-sea environmental conditions. Using 364 marine microbial metagenomes, we investigate how the average genome size of uncultured planktonic prokaryotes varies across the tropical and polar oceans to the hadal realm. We find that genome size is highest in the perennially cold polar ocean, reflecting elongation of coding genes and gene dosage effects due to duplications in the interior ocean microbiome. Moreover, the rate of change in genome size due to temperature is 16-fold higher than with depth up to 200 m. Our results demonstrate how environmental factors can influence marine microbial genome size selection and ecological strategies of the microbiome.

Indexed as

Genome, MicrobialMicrobiotaGenome SizeMetagenomeOceans and SeasSeawater

Identifiers

PMID36914646
PMCPMC10011403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read37
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.