Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36914188›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Protocol for the Pathways Study: a realist evaluation of staff social ties and communication in the delivery of neonatal care in Kenya.

Conrad Wanyama, Claire Blacklock, Juliet Jepkosgei, Mike English, Lisa Hinton, Jacob McKnight, Sassy Molyneux, Mwanamvua Boga, Peris Muoga Musitia, Geoff Wong

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Conrad Wanyama *Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya CWanyama@kemri-wellcome.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3553-6679
Claire Blacklock *Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Juliet JepkosgeiHealth Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mike EnglishHealth Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-7427-0826
Lisa HintonThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6082-3151
Jacob McKnightTropical Medicine, University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford, UK.
Sassy MolyneuxNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mwanamvua BogaCentre for Geographic Medicine Research-Coast, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Peris Muoga MusitiaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-4715-902X
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Oxford · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N013468/1Wellcome Trust 207522Wellcome Trust 207522/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe informal social ties that health workers form with their colleagues influence knowledge, skills and individual and group behaviours and norms in the workplace. However, improved understanding of these 'software' aspects of the workforce (eg, relationships, norms, power) have been neglected in health systems research. In Kenya, neonatal mortality has lagged despite reductions in other age groups under 5 years. A rich understanding of workforce social ties is likely to be valuable to inform behavioural change initiatives seeking to improve quality of neonatal healthcare.This study aims to better understand the relational components among health workers in Kenyan neonatal care areas, and how such understanding might inform the design and implementation of quality improvement interventions targeting health workers' behaviours. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will collect data in two phases. In phase 1, we will conduct non-participant observation of hospital staff during patient care and hospital meetings, a social network questionnaire with staff, in-depth interviews, key informant interviews and focus group discussions at two large public hospitals in Kenya. Data will be collected purposively and analysed using realist evaluation, interim analyses including thematic analysis of qualitative data and quantitative analysis of social network metrics. In phase 2, a stakeholder workshop will be held to discuss and refine phase one findings.Study findings will help refine an evolving programme theory with recommendations used to develop theory-informed interventions targeted at enhancing quality improvement efforts in Kenyan hospitals. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI/SERU/CGMR-C/241/4374) and Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC 519-22). Research findings will be shared with the sites, and disseminated in seminars, conferences and published in open-access scientific journals.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareQuality ImprovementChild, PreschoolCommunicationFocus GroupsHumansInfant, NewbornKenyaHealth policyNEONATOLOGYQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36914188
PMCPMC10016238
OpenAlexW4324101879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.