ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2023
[Consensus of Chinese Experts on Nursing of Lung Cancer in the Elderly (2022 Edition)].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Ciprofol on Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Efficacy of traditional Chinese exercise on postoperative rehabilitation in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- [Expert Consensus on Shared Decision-making in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ground-glass Opacity-featured Lung Adenocarcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Article
- Effects of evidence-based nursing under a quantitative assessment strategy on cancer-related fatigue, self-management ability, and quality of life in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In view of the limited data from the current prospective studies on the treatment of elderly patients with lung cancer, while drawing on The expert consensus of accelerated rehabilitation nursing in peri-operative period of lung operation in the elderly, the nursing care of the aged patients with lung cancer still needs to be concerned about radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immuno-targeted therapy. To this end, Lung Cancer Specialty Committee of Chinese Elderly Health Care Association organized a national team of thoracic medical and nursing experts, based on the latest research progress and the best clinical evidence at home and abroad, took the lead in preparing Consensus of Chinese experts on nursing of lung cancer in the elderly (2022 edition). Based on evidence-based medicine (EBM) and problem-oriented medicine, the author searched the relevant literatures at home and abroad and combined with the clinical situation in our country, aimed at the different treatment methods of the aged patients with lung cancer, to further standardize the application of assessment tools, guide the implementation of clinical symptoms observation and nursing measures, pay attention to the prevention of various high-risk factors of elderly patients, to multidisciplinary cooperation as a model, holistic nursing as the connotation, develop this consensus. In order to make the treatment and nursing practice of senile lung cancer patients more standardized, more targeted, so as to reduce the occurrence of complications, and also provide references and guidances for related clinical research. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.