Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36913917›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Characteristics and Outcomes of Elderly Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients following Surgical Resection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Elizabeth M Garcia, Sanjna N Nerurkar, Eunice X Tan, Shaun Y S Tan, Ern-Wei Peck, Sabrina X Z Quek, Readon Teh, Margaret Teng, Andrew Tran, Ee Jin Yeo and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Elizabeth M GarciaMountain View High School, Mountain View, California, USA.
Sanjna N NerurkarDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Eunice X TanDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Shaun Y S TanDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ern-Wei PeckDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Sabrina X Z QuekDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Readon TehDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Margaret TengDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrew TranDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ee Jin YeoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Michael LeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Connie WongLane Medical Library, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Ramsey CheungDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Daniel Q HuangDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to aging of the global population, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly common among elderly patients, but outcomes after curative hepatic resection are unclear. Using a metanalytic approach, we aimed to estimate overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and complication rates in elderly HCC patients undergoing resection.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to November 10, 2020, for studies reporting outcomes in elderly (age ≥65 years) patients with HCC undergoing curative surgical resection. Pooled estimates were generated using a random-effects model.

resultsWe screened 8,598 articles and included 42 studies (7,778 elderly patients). The mean age was 74.45 years (95% CI: 72.89-76.02), 75.54% were male (95% CI: 72.53-78.32) and 66.73% had cirrhosis (95% CI: 43.93-83.96). The mean tumor size was 5.50 cm (95% CI: 4.71-6.29) and 16.01% had multiple tumors (95% CI: 10.74-23.19). The 1-year (86.02% vs. 86.66%, p = 0.84) and 5-year OS (51.60% vs. 53.78%) between non-elderly and elderly patients were similar. Likewise, there were no differences in the 1-year (67.32% vs. 73.26%, p = 0.11) and 5-year RFS (31.57% vs. 30.25%, p = 0.67) between non-elderly and elderly patients. There was a higher rate of minor complications (21.95% vs. 13.71%, p = 0.03) among elderly patients compared with non-elderly patients, but no difference in major complications (p = 0.43).

conclusionThese data show that OS, recurrence, and major complications after liver resection for HCC are comparable between elderly and non-elderly patients and may inform clinical management of HCC in this population.

backgroundDue to aging of the global population, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly common among elderly patients, but outcomes after curative hepatic resection are unclear. Using a metanalytic approach, we aimed to estimate overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and complication rates in elderly HCC patients undergoing resection.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to November 10, 2020, for studies reporting outcomes in elderly (age ≥65 years) patients with HCC undergoing curative surgical resection. Pooled estimates were generated using a random-effects model.

resultsWe screened 8,598 articles and included 42 studies (7,778 elderly patients). The mean age was 74.45 years (95% CI: 72.89-76.02), 75.54% were male (95% CI: 72.53-78.32) and 66.73% had cirrhosis (95% CI: 43.93-83.96). The mean tumor size was 5.50 cm (95% CI: 4.71-6.29) and 16.01% had multiple tumors (95% CI: 10.74-23.19). The 1-year (86.02% vs. 86.66%, p = 0.84) and 5-year OS (51.60% vs. 53.78%) between non-elderly and elderly patients were similar. Likewise, there were no differences in the 1-year (67.32% vs. 73.26%, p = 0.11) and 5-year RFS (31.57% vs. 30.25%, p = 0.67) between non-elderly and elderly patients. There was a higher rate of minor complications (21.95% vs. 13.71%, p = 0.03) among elderly patients compared with non-elderly patients, but no difference in major complications (p = 0.43).

conclusionThese data show that OS, recurrence, and major complications after liver resection for HCC are comparable between elderly and non-elderly patients and may inform clinical management of HCC in this population.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeHepatic resectionHepatocellular carcinomaLiver cancerPrognosisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36913917
PMCPMC11965816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.