Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36913791›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hygiene and environmental health2023

Assessing sustained uptake of latrine and child feces management interventions: Extended follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh 1-3.5 years after intervention initiation.

Mahfuza Islam, Mahbubur Rahman, Mohammad Abdullah Heel Kafi, Leanne Unicomb, Mostafizur Rahman, Andrew Mertens, Jade Benjamin-Chung, Benjamin F Arnold, John M Colford, Stephen P Luby and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Mahfuza IslamEnvironmental Intervention Unit, Infectious Disease Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Electronic address: mi.sheuli@gmail.com.
Mahbubur RahmanEnvironmental Intervention Unit, Infectious Disease Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Abdullah Heel KafiSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Leanne UnicombEnvironmental Intervention Unit, Infectious Disease Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mostafizur RahmanEnvironmental Intervention Unit, Infectious Disease Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Andrew MertensDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jade Benjamin-ChungDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Benjamin F ArnoldFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
John M ColfordDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Stephen P LubyWoods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Ayse ErcumenDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDUniversity of California, Berkeley · USNorth Carolina State University · USStanford University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES025128 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Sue Fenton · 2015 to 2026
$18.3M
Effects of sanitation on pathogen transmission and child health in BangladeshR01HD078912 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI COLFORD, JOHN M · 2014 to 2017
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD078912NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES025128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSanitation interventions typically result in modest increases in latrine access, and any gains in latrine access and use are often not sustained over time. Sanitation programs also rarely include child-focused interventions such as potties. We aimed to assess the sustained effect of a multi-component sanitation intervention on access to and use of latrines and child feces management tools in rural Bangladesh.

methodsWe conducted a longitudinal substudy nested within the WASH Benefits randomized controlled trial. The trial provided latrine upgrades, child potties and sani-scoops for feces removal, along with behavior change promotion to encourage use of the delivered hardware. Promotion visits to intervention recipients were frequent during the first 2 years after intervention initiation, decreased in frequency between years 2-3, and ceased after 3 years. We enrolled a random subset of 720 households from the sanitation and control arms of the trial in a substudy and visited them quarterly between 1 and 3.5 years after intervention initiation. At each visit, field staff recorded sanitation-related behaviors through spot-check observations and structured questionnaires. We assessed intervention effects on observed indicators of hygienic latrine access, potty use and sani-scoop use and investigated whether these effects were modified by duration of follow-up, ongoing behavior change promotion and household characteristics.

resultsThe intervention increased hygienic latrine access from 37% among controls to 94% in the sanitation arm (p < 0.001). Access among intervention recipients remained high 3.5 years after intervention initiation, including periods with no active promotion. Gains in access were higher among households with less education, less wealth and larger number of residents. The intervention increased availability of child potties from 29% among controls to 98% in the sanitation arm (p < 0.001). However, fewer than 25% of intervention households reported exclusive child defecation in a potty or had observed indicators of potty and sani-scoop use, and gains in potty use declined over the follow-up period, even with ongoing promotion.

conclusionOur findings from an intervention that provided free products and intensive initial behavior change promotion suggest a sustained increase in hygienic latrine access up to 3.5 years after intervention initiation but infrequent use of child feces management tools. Studies should investigate strategies to ensure sustained adoption of safe child feces management practices.

Indexed as

HygieneToilet FacilitiesBangladeshFecesFollow-Up StudiesHumansRural PopulationSanitationChild feces managementLatrineOpen defecationPottySani-scoopSanitationUser uptake

Identifiers

PMID36913791
PMCPMC10186382
OpenAlexW4323923890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.