ArticlePloS one2023
Efficacy of optical coherence tomography in the triage of women with minor abnormal cervical cytology before colposcopy.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Deep Learning Model for Cervical Optical Coherence Tomography Image Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) for detecting cervical lesions in women with minor abnormal cytology results (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)).
methodsA prospective study was conducted at gynecologic clinic from Mar 2021 to Sep 2021. The recruited women with cervical cytological findings of ASC-US or LSIL were inspected with OCT before colposcopy-directed cervical biopsy. The diagnostic performance of OCT, alone and in combination with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing were evaluated to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+)/CIN3 or worse (CIN3+). The rate of colposcopy referral and the immediate risk of CIN3+ of OCT were calculated.
resultsA total of 349 women with minor abnormal cervical cytology results were enrolled. For detection of CIN2+/CIN3+, the sensitivity and NPV of OCT were lower than those of hrHPV testing (CIN2+: 71.3% vs. 95.4%, 89.0% vs. 91.1%, P < 0.001; CIN3+: 75% vs. 93.8%, 96.5% vs. 95.6%, P < 0.001), but the specificity, accuracy and PPV were higher than those of hrHPV testing (CIN2+: 77.5% vs. 15.6%, 75.9% vs. 35.5%, 51.2% vs. 27.3%, P < 0.001; CIN3+: 69.4% vs. 13.6%, 69.9% vs. 20.9%, 19.8% vs. 9.9%, P < 0.001). OCT combined with hrHPV testing (CIN2+: 80.9%; CIN3+: 72.6%) showed higher specificity than that of OCT alone (P < 0.001). The colposcopy referral rate base on OCT classification was lower than that based on hrHPV testing (34.7% vs. 87.1%, P < 0.001). Patients with hrHPV-positive ASC-US and hrHPV-negative LSIL cytology, the immediate CIN3+ risk in OCT negative cases was less than 4%.
conclusionsOCT alone or combination with hrHPV testing shows good performance for detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in patients with ASC-US/LSIL cytology. OCT is an effective method for colposcopy triage in women with hrHPV-positive ASC-US and hrHPV-negative LSIL cytology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.