Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36913227›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Pediatric Forearm Fracture Characteristics as Prognostic Indicators of Healing.

Brandon W Knopp, Matthew Harris

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06799377 (Complications Related to Activity After Both Bone Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06799377 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Complications Related to Activity After Both Bone Fractures: Why do we Restrict Activity?

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2025 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsForearm Fractures (Both Bone Forearm Fractures, Isolated Ulnar Shaft, Isolated Radial Shaft)ArmsRestricted Activity Reccomendations, Full Activity/Limited Activity Reccomendations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Influence of elastic stable intramedullary nailing on fracture reduction of paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brandon W KnoppEndocrinology, Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, USA.
Matthew HarrisOrthopedic Surgery, Jupiter Medical Center, Jupiter, USA.
Jupiter Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background This study was conducted to investigate the characteristics, complications, radiologic features, and clinical course of patients undergoing reduction of forearm fractures to better inform patient prognosis and postoperative management. Methodology We conducted a retrospective chart review of 75 pediatric patients treated for forearm fractures between January 2014 and September 2021 in a 327-bed regional medical center. A preoperative radiological assessment and chart review was performed. Percent fracture displacement, location, orientation, comminution, fracture line visibility, and angle of angulation were determined by anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs. Percent fracture displacement was calculated as 𝐵𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 / 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 × 100% = % 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡. The angle of angulation and percent fracture displacement were calculated by averaging AP and lateral radiograph measurements. Results A total of 75 cases, averaging 11.6 ± 4.1 years, were identified as having a complete fracture of the radius and/or ulna, with 66 receiving closed reduction and nine receiving fixation via an intramedullary device or percutaneous pinning. Eight (10.7%) patients experienced complications, with four resulting in a refracture and four resulting in significant loss of reduction without refracture. Fractures in the proximal two-thirds of the radius were associated with a significant increase in complications compared to fractures in the distal one-third of the radius (33.3% vs 3.6%) (p = 0.0005). Likewise, a greater fracture displacement percentage was associated with a lower risk of refracture post-reduction as those experiencing complications had over 30% greater total displacement pre-reduction compared to patients who did not experience complications such as refracture or loss of reduction (p < 0.0001). No elevated risk of complications was found based on fracture orientation, angulation, fracture line visibility, forearm bone(s) fractured, sex, age, or arm affected. Conclusions Our results highlight radius fracture location and percent fracture displacement as markers with prognostic value following forearm fracture. These measurements are simply calculated via pre-reduction radiographs, providing an efficient method of informing the risk of complications following forearm fracture reduction.

Indexed as

hand-wrist radiographlong-term follow-uplong-term follow-up after orthopedic surgeryorthopedic surgerypediatric forearm fracturepediatric orthopedic surgerypediatrics patientradius fractureulna fracture

Identifiers

PMID36913227
PMCPMC9998076
OpenAlexW4319340968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.