Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36913161›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2023

Can phytogenic additives replace monensin sodium in beef cattle feeding?

Méry Cristina de Sá Assis, Gabriela Rayane da Rocha Costa, Francisca Mônica Couras Dias, Camila Sousa da Silva, Jucelane Salvino de Lima, Thaysa Rodrigues Torres, Dulciene Karla de Andrade Silva, Evaristo Jorge Oliveira de Souza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Méry Cristina de Sá AssisFederal Rural University of Pernambuco, Gregório Ferraz Nogueira Avenue, S/N, Serra Talhada, PE, 56909-535, Brazil.
Gabriela Rayane da Rocha CostaFederal Rural University of Pernambuco, Gregório Ferraz Nogueira Avenue, S/N, Serra Talhada, PE, 56909-535, Brazil.
Francisca Mônica Couras DiasFederal Rural University of Pernambuco, Gregório Ferraz Nogueira Avenue, S/N, Serra Talhada, PE, 56909-535, Brazil.
Camila Sousa da SilvaFederal Rural University of Pernambuco, Gregório Ferraz Nogueira Avenue, S/N, Serra Talhada, PE, 56909-535, Brazil.
Jucelane Salvino de LimaFederal University of Western Pará, Vera Paz Street, S/N, Santarém, PA, 68040-255, Brazil.
Thaysa Rodrigues TorresFederal Rural University of Pernambuco, Gregório Ferraz Nogueira Avenue, S/N, Serra Talhada, PE, 56909-535, Brazil.
Dulciene Karla de Andrade SilvaFederal University of Agreste of Pernambuco, Bom Pastor Avenue, S/N, Boa Vista, CEP, Garanhuns, PE, 55292-270, Brazil.
Evaristo Jorge Oliveira de SouzaFederal Rural University of Pernambuco, Gregório Ferraz Nogueira Avenue, S/N, Serra Talhada, PE, 56909-535, Brazil. evaristojorge@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2206-414X
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal do Oeste do Pará · BR

Funding

Federal Rural University of Pernambuco PRPPG 015/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monensin sodium is one of the most common ionophores used in livestock feeding; however, ionophores are condemned by organized consumer groups. Bioactive compounds from plants found in the seasonally dry tropical forest have similar mechanisms of action as ionophores. The aim was to investigate the effects of replacing monensin sodium with phytogenic additives on the nutritional efficiency of beef cattle. Five 14-month-old Nellore bulls (average body weight 452.68 ± 42.60 kg) were used in the study. The experiment was designed as a 5 × 5 Latin Square (five treatments and five 22-day experimental periods). Within each period, 15 days were used for adaptation of animals to experimental conditions and 7 days for data collection. Bulls were fed a control diet (without additives), monensin (a diet containing monensin sodium 40% as a synthetic additive), and three diets containing phytogenic additives prepared from Anadenanthera macrocarpa (Benth) Brenan, Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd) Poiret, or Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. Nutritional efficiency was assessed through feed intake, nutrient digestibility, feeding behavior, and hematological parameters. Monensin and phytogenic additives did not influence (P > 0.05) feeding behavior or hematological parameters, but the nutrient intake was highest for bulls supplemented phytogenic additives (P < 0.05). Monensin supplementation did not influence (P > 0.05) feed intake. The phytogenic additives and monensin sodium increased (P < 0.05) the nutrient digestibility. Therefore, the phytogenic additives from P. juliflora, A. macrocarpa, and M. tenuiflora can be recommended to enhance the nutritional efficiency of confined Nellore cattle.

Indexed as

DigestionMonensinAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleDietDietary SupplementsIonophoresMaleRumenIonophoresMonensinAnadenanthera macrocarpa (Benth.) BrenanIonophoresMimosa tenuiflora (Willd) PoiretNatural drugsProsopis juliflora (Sw.) DC

Identifiers

PMID36913161
OpenAlexW4324017633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.