Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36913123›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023

Sensitivity investigation of open-ended coaxial probe in skin cancer detection.

Guofang Xu, Henghui Liu, Qiang Huang, Xuefei Yu, Xiang Nan, Jijun Han

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Study on the difference of high frequency dielectric properties of biological tissues measured by air and packed coaxial probe].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guofang XuDepartment of Medical Informatics, School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Henghui LiuDepartment of Medical Informatics, School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Qiang HuangDepartment of Equipment, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuefei YuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiang NanBasic Medical School, School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. xnan@ahmu.edu.cn.
Jijun HanDepartment of Medical Informatics, School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. hanjijun@ahmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6063-5089
Anhui Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open-ended coaxial probe method is one of the most common modalities in measuring dielectric properties (DPs) of biological tissues. Due to the significant differences between the tumors and normal tissues in DPs, the technique can be used to detect skin cancer in the early stage. Although various studies have been reported, systematic assessment is in urgent need to advance it to clinical applications, for its parameters interactions and detecting limitations remained unclear. In this study, we aim to provide a comprehensive examination of this method, including the minimum detectable tumor size by using a three-layer skin model via simulation and demonstrated that open-ended coaxial probe method can be used for detection of early-stage skin cancer. The smallest detecting size are subject to different subtypes: for BCC, inside the skin is 0.5 mm radius × 0.1 mm height; for SCC, inside the skin is 1.4 mm × 1.3 mm in radius and height; the smallest distinguishing size of BCC is 0.6 mm × 0.7 mm in radius and height; for SCC is 1.0 mm × 1.0 mm in radius and height; for MM is 0.7 mm × 0.4 mm in radius and height. The experiment results showed that sensitivity was affected by tumor dimension, probe size, skin height, and cancer subtype. The probe is more sensitive to cylinder tumor radius than height growing on the surface of the skin while the smallest size probe is the most sensitive among the working probes. We provide a detailed systematic evaluation of the parameters employed in the method for further applications.

Indexed as

SkinSkin NeoplasmsComputer SimulationHumansDiagnose cancerDielectric propertiesOpen-ended coaxial probeSensitivitiesSkin cancer

Identifiers

PMID36913123
OpenAlexW4324020290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.