Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36913105›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2023

Imaging of large volume subcutaneous deposition using MRI: exploratory clinical study results.

Ronald J Pettis, Wendy D Woodley, Kevin C Ossege, Adam Blum, Natasha G Bolick, Christopher J Rini

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Qualification of Subcutaneous Injection Devices for Monoclonal Antibodies.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald J PettisBD Technologies & Innovation, 21 Davis Dr., Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27709, USA. rpettis@bd.com.
Wendy D WoodleyBD Technologies & Innovation, 21 Davis Dr., Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Kevin C OssegeKinetic Vision, 10651 Aerohub Blvd., Cincinnati, OH, 45215, USA.
Adam BlumKinetic Vision, 10651 Aerohub Blvd., Cincinnati, OH, 45215, USA.
Natasha G BolickBD Technologies & Innovation, 21 Davis Dr., Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Christopher J RiniBD Technologies & Innovation, 21 Davis Dr., Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
BD Technologie (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subcutaneous (SC) delivery is a preferred route of administration for biotherapeutics but has predominantly been limited to volumes below 3 mL. With higher volume drug formulations emerging, understanding large volume SC (LVSC) depot localization, dispersion, and impact on the SC environment has become more critical. The aim of this exploratory clinical imaging study was to assess the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify and characterize LVSC injections and their effect on SC tissue as a function of delivery site and volume. Healthy adult subjects received incremental injections of normal saline up to 5 mL total volume in the arm and up to 10 mL in the abdomen and thigh. MRI images were acquired after each incremental SC injection. Post-image analysis was performed to correct imaging artifacts, identify depot tissue location, create 3-dimensional (3D) SC depot rendering, and estimate in vivo bolus volumes and SC tissue distention. LVSC saline depots were readily achieved, imaged using MRI, and quantified via subsequent image reconstructions. Imaging artifacts occurred under some conditions, necessitating corrections applied during image analysis. 3D renderings were created for both the depot alone and in relation to the SC tissue boundaries. LVSC depots remained predominantly within the SC tissue and expanded with increasing injection volume. Depot geometry varied across injection sites and localized physiological structure changes were observed to accommodate LVSC injection volumes. MRI is an effective means to clinically visualize LVSC depots and SC architecture allowing assessment of deposition and dispersion of injected formulations.Trial Registration: Not applicable for this exploratory clinical imaging study.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultHumansInjections, SubcutaneousDepot localizationLarge volume subcutaneous injectionMagnetic resonance imagingSubcutaneous tissue

Identifiers

PMID36913105
PMCPMC10382358
OpenAlexW4324017380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.