Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36913031›Full record

Observational studyMaternal and child health journal2023

Mixed Bacterial Growth in Prenatal Urine Cultures; An Investigation into Prevalence, Contributory Factors and the Impact of education-based Interventions.

Lindsay M Kindinger, Hannah Linton, Catherine P James, Camille Mallet, Carmel Curtis, Bruce Macrae, Anna L David

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Maternal and child health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lindsay M KindingerElizabeth Garrett Anderson, Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, Medical School Building, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK. Lindsay.kindinger@health.wa.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-3834
Hannah LintonElizabeth Garrett Anderson, Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, Medical School Building, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK.
Catherine P JamesElizabeth Garrett Anderson, Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, Medical School Building, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK.
Camille MalletWomen's Health Division, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 25 Grafton Way, London, WC1E 6DB, UK.
Carmel CurtisClinical Microbiology, 5th Floor Central, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK.
Bruce MacraeClinical Microbiology, 5th Floor Central, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK.
Anna L DavidElizabeth Garrett Anderson, Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, Medical School Building, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6AU, UK.
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBKing Edward Memorial Hospital · AUUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUndiagnosed urinary tract infections (UTIs) in pregnancy are associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Urine microbiology cultures reported as 'mixed bacterial growth' (MBG) frequently present a diagnostic dilemma for healthcare providers. We investigated external factors contributing to elevated rates of (MBG) within a large tertiary maternity centre in London, UK, and assessed the efficacy of health service interventions to mitigate these. DESCRIPTION: This prospective, observational study of asymptomatic pregnant women attending their first prenatal clinic appointment aimed to establish (i) the prevalence of MBG in routine prenatal urine microbiology cultures, (ii) the association between urine cultures and the duration to laboratory processing and (iii) ways in which MBG may be reduced in pregnancy. Specifically we assessed the impact of patient-clinician interaction and that of an education package on optimal urine sampling technique. ASSESSMENT: Among 212 women observed over 6 weeks, the negative, positive and MBG urine culture rates were 66%, 10% and 2% respectively. Shorter duration from urine sample collection to laboratory arrival correlated with higher rates of negative cultures. Urine samples arriving in the laboratory within 3 hours of collection were most likely to be reported as culture negative (74%), and were least likely to be reported as MBG (21%) or culture positive (6%), compared to samples arriving > 6 hours (71%, 14% and 14% respectively; P < 0.001). A midwifery education package effectively reduced rates of MBG (37% pre-intervention vs 19% post-intervention, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89). Women who did not receive verbal instructions prior to providing their sample had 5-fold higher rates of MBG (P < 0.001).

conclusionAs many as 24% of prenatal urine screening cultures are reported as MBG. Patient-midwife interaction before urine sample collection and rapid transfer of urine samples to the laboratory within 3 hours reduces the rate of MBG in prenatal urine cultures. Reinforcing this message through education may improve accuracy of test results.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousUrinary Tract InfectionsFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisPrevalenceProspective StudiesAsymptomatic BacteriuriaMixed growthPregnancyUrinary Tract InfectionUrine Culture

Identifiers

PMID36913031
PMCPMC10359349
OpenAlexW4324018509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.