ArticleClinical rheumatology2023
Adaptation and validation of the Bulgarian version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Quality of Life Questionnaire (L-QoL).
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation: A Critical Step in Multi-National Survey Studies.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous disease with multiple clinical manifestations, which causes a significant deterioration in the quality of life (QoL). The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Quality of Life Questionnaire (L-QoL) is a lupus-specific measure used to determine the burden of the disease and it applies the need-based model of QoL. Our aim was to produce the first successfully validated foreign language version of the questionnaire.
methodsThe development of the Bulgarian version involved three stages: translation, field testing and psychometric evaluation. Translation was conducted by an expert linguist working with a developer of the original L-QoL, followed by interviews with monolingual lay individuals. Face and content validity of the translation were assessed by cognitive debriefing interviews with Bulgarian SLE patients. Finally, the L-QoL was validated by administering the questionnaire to a random sample of SLE patients on two occasions, 2 weeks apart to evaluate its reliability and validity.
resultsIn the validation survey, the new Bulgarian version demonstrated high internal consistency (the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92), and test-retest reliability (0.97). Additionally, scores on the L-QoL were correlated with those on the SF-36 sections to determine convergent validity and the strongest correlation was observed between L-QoL scores and the social functioning section of the SF-36. Known group validity was established by testing the ability of the Bulgarian L-QoL to distinguish between subgroups of patients from the study pool.
conclusionsThe demonstrated excellent psychometric properties ensure that the Bulgarian L-QoL accurately captures the impact of SLE on the quality of life. Key points • The Bulgarian version of the L-QoL is a valid and reliable measure of QoL in lupus patients. • The Bulgarian version of the L-QoL can be used as an outcome measure in research, clinical trials and routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36913029What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.