Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36912999›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2023

Sample size determination for training set optimization in genomic prediction.

Po-Ya Wu, Jen-Hsiang Ou, Chen-Tuo Liao

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multi-trait ridge regression BLUP withFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Constructing training sets for genomic selection to identify superior genotypes in candidate populations.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Po-Ya WuDepartment of Agronomy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jen-Hsiang OuDepartment of Agronomy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen-Tuo LiaoDepartment of Agronomy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. ctliao@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9777-3701

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 110-2118-M-002-002-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageA practical approach is developed to determine a cost-effective optimal training set for selective phenotyping in a genomic prediction study. An R function is provided to facilitate the application of the approach. Genomic prediction (GP) is a statistical method used to select quantitative traits in animal or plant breeding. For this purpose, a statistical prediction model is first built that uses phenotypic and genotypic data in a training set. The trained model is then used to predict genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for individuals within a breeding population. Setting the sample size of the training set usually takes into account time and space constraints that are inevitable in an agricultural experiment. However, the determination of the sample size remains an unresolved issue for a GP study. By applying the logistic growth curve to identify prediction accuracy for the GEBVs and the training set size, a practical approach was developed to determine a cost-effective optimal training set for a given genome dataset with known genotypic data. Three real genome datasets were used to illustrate the proposed approach. An R function is provided to facilitate widespread application of this approach to sample size determination, which can help breeders to identify a set of genotypes with an economical sample size for selective phenotyping.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsGenomicsGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingSample Size

Identifiers

PMID36912999
PMCPMC10011335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read37
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.